2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assembly of structured CeCO3OH and its decomposition in H2 for a novel tactic to obtain CeO2- with excellent photocatalytic property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure , the weight loss before 200 °C was attributed to the removal of free water or adsorbed water, while the significant weight loss from 200 to 400 °C was attributed to the decomposition of the mixed-phase cerium compound samples. , The total weight loss between 200 and 400 °C first increased and then remained basically unchanged with an extension of the reaction time, corresponding to the transformation of the dominant phase of the product from CeO 2 to Ce(HCOO)C 2 O 4 , Ce(HCOO) 3 , and Ce(OH)CO 3 . The theoretical weight loss values of CeO 2 , Ce(HCOO)C 2 O 4 , Ce(HCOO) 3 and Ce(OH)CO 3 can be calculated from the following reactions: .25ex2ex CeO 2 CeO 2 Δ m = 0 % .25ex2ex 4 Ce false( HCOO false) C 2 O 4 + 5 O 2 4 CeO 2 + 12 CO 2 + 2 H 2 O Δ m = 37.0 % .25ex2ex 4 Ce ( HCOO ) 3 + 7 O 2 4 CeO 2 + 12 CO 2 + 6 H…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure , the weight loss before 200 °C was attributed to the removal of free water or adsorbed water, while the significant weight loss from 200 to 400 °C was attributed to the decomposition of the mixed-phase cerium compound samples. , The total weight loss between 200 and 400 °C first increased and then remained basically unchanged with an extension of the reaction time, corresponding to the transformation of the dominant phase of the product from CeO 2 to Ce(HCOO)C 2 O 4 , Ce(HCOO) 3 , and Ce(OH)CO 3 . The theoretical weight loss values of CeO 2 , Ce(HCOO)C 2 O 4 , Ce(HCOO) 3 and Ce(OH)CO 3 can be calculated from the following reactions: .25ex2ex CeO 2 CeO 2 Δ m = 0 % .25ex2ex 4 Ce false( HCOO false) C 2 O 4 + 5 O 2 4 CeO 2 + 12 CO 2 + 2 H 2 O Δ m = 37.0 % .25ex2ex 4 Ce ( HCOO ) 3 + 7 O 2 4 CeO 2 + 12 CO 2 + 6 H…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the characteristic peak position of 11.81 at.% Ce‐doped sample did not shift significantly compared with that of 8.93 at.% sample, which reveals no increase of Ce as substitutional atoms in Ti 4 O 7 (Figure 4A). When the Ce content reaches up to 15.05 at.%, only CeO 2 characteristic peaks located at 461.8 cm −1 (F 2g ) caused by the symmetric vibration of Ce–8O appeared due to its excessive peak intensity 57,58 (Figure 4A). The typical Raman peak of CeO 2 is located at 464 cm −1 , and the redshift of the F 2g results from lattice expansion due to oxygen vacancy and electron reduction 59,60 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oxygen content in two samples was calculated according to Equations ( 7) and ( 8), which gave valence states of Ti, Ti +3.53 in the pristine one, and Ti +3. 57…”
Section: Lattice Parameters Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, precipitation and hydrothermal methods are prevalent. In the preparation process, lower concentrations (below 0.1 M) and template agents or surfactants are typically used to achieve a specific morphology and a uniform distribution of CeO 2 [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%