2018
DOI: 10.1177/2042753018784950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-assessment in Massive Open Online Courses

Abstract: Massive Open Online Courses appear to have high attrition rates, involve students in peer-assessment with patriotic bias and promote education for already educated people. This paper suggests a formative assessment model which takes into consideration these issues. Specifically, this paper focuses on the assessment of open-format questions in Massive Open Online Courses. It describes the current assessment methods in Massive Open Online Courses and it argues that self-assessment should be the only way of forma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of HLT principles presented in the previous section, peer assessment fosters students' engagement. Taken together, the note by [12] and recommendation by [15], it seems possible that peer assessment can develop more expert-like evaluative judgement (critique, analyse, provide feedback). This chapter also notes that with peer assessment, students can demonstrate expertise through the creation of non-automatically gradable materials (e.g., video presentations, essays, reports, reflections, designs).…”
Section: Peer-assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of HLT principles presented in the previous section, peer assessment fosters students' engagement. Taken together, the note by [12] and recommendation by [15], it seems possible that peer assessment can develop more expert-like evaluative judgement (critique, analyse, provide feedback). This chapter also notes that with peer assessment, students can demonstrate expertise through the creation of non-automatically gradable materials (e.g., video presentations, essays, reports, reflections, designs).…”
Section: Peer-assessmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some studies declare that the use of self-assessment in MOOCs is underestimated to some extent; Ventista [12] argue that it is the most suitable assessment method to correspond to the needs of these self-regulated students and a potential solution to the high attrition rates and the patriotic grading bias during peerassessment. Nevertheless, Admiraal, Huisman and van den Ven [13] corroborate the declaration of undervalued self-assessment in MOOCs because their study suggested a bias of self-assessments that led them to conclude that self-assessments might not be an excellent way to assess students' performance in MOOCs.…”
Section: Self-assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So that the peer assessment model in cases like this is not suitable for use in the assessment. In contrast, the self-assessment model is considered the most suitable assessment method to fulfill the needs of independent learners [10].…”
Section: Assessment In Moocs Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In online learning using e-learning system tools, some monitored activities are often represented by participants activities in clicking on the system such as auto content, forumpage, subpage, homepage. In addition, engagement can also be observed through the movement of body parts such as eyes, head and mouth [10]. The involvement of students in online learning such as MOOC, LMS, and VLE can be measured using clickstream data from these system services [13].…”
Section: Assessment In Moocs Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%