1992
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/25/6/006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-avoiding walks in two to five dimensions: exact enumerations and series study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
65
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus if use the value of γ given by [17], see (1), we get a value for β c in agreement with their estimate (13). However if we use our estimate of γ, we get a β c which is off by five to twenty times the stated error bars.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus if use the value of γ given by [17], see (1), we get a value for β c in agreement with their estimate (13). However if we use our estimate of γ, we get a β c which is off by five to twenty times the stated error bars.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Using the values of c N reported in [5,17], we find β c = 0.2134987 ± 0.0000001 for δ = 1.1619 0.2134811 ± 0.0000031 for δ = 1.1576 (15) where the "error" indicates the spread of the Padè approximants we have considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Only recently have consistent, but significantly more precise, experimental results been reported in low gravity superfluid experiments [41]. Also the precision of results coming from high temperature expansions [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and various numerical simulations [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] on the lattice has kept steadily improving.…”
Section: Exponentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, in particular for N = 0 in Refs. [4,47,61] and for N = 1 in Refs. [7,62], numerical work has suggested slightly different confluent exponents, which might be more accurate or, to some extent, also provide an "effective" description of higher confluent corrections.…”
Section: B Biased Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%