2021
DOI: 10.1109/tpds.2020.3009406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Balancing Federated Learning With Global Imbalanced Data in Mobile Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the greedy selection, the server first randomly selects a client, then continuously select clients to make the KL divergence from the data distribution of selected clients to the uniform data distribution to be minimum. Readers can refer to [8] for more details. The greedy selection method requires an overall knowledge of clients' data distribution, which is not applicable in secure FL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the greedy selection, the server first randomly selects a client, then continuously select clients to make the KL divergence from the data distribution of selected clients to the uniform data distribution to be minimum. Readers can refer to [8] for more details. The greedy selection method requires an overall knowledge of clients' data distribution, which is not applicable in secure FL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAVOR [30] uses a deep Q-learning model to select clients to maximize a reward that encourages the increase of accuracy and penalizes the use of more rounds. The framework in Astraea [8] acknowledges the access of data distribution of clients. It uses a greedy algorithm to balance data to reach the optimum in a global data imbalance setting.…”
Section: Client Selection In Flmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a comprehensive comparison of communication efficiency between SL and FL was presented by Singh et al [33]. To study the relationship between communication efficiency and factors such as the total client number and [33] 2019 Split Learning IoT, Healthcare Thapa et al [34] 2020 Split Learning Healthcare, Image classification Khan et al [27] 2020 Stackelberg game theory Image classification Data Heterogeneity Jeong et al [35] 2018 Federated Augmentation Image classification Sener et al [36] 2018 K-Center clustering Image classification Zhao et al [37] 2018 Data-sharing strategy Image classification Wang et al [38] 2020 Reinforcement Learning Image classification Duan et al [39] 2020 Data augmentation and rescheduling Image classification Sun et al [22] 2021 Segmented Federated Learning Cybersecurity model parameter number, a trade-off between the two models was demonstrated (Fig. 4 (b)), where the hyperbola shows the regions where one model outperforms the other regarding communication efficiency, in other words, less data transmission between the client and the PS.…”
Section: A Communication Efficiency Under Edge Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeong et al [35] 2018 Federated Augmentation Image classification Sener et al [36] 2018 K-Center clustering Image classification Zhao et al [37] 2018 Data-sharing strategy Image classification Wang et al [38] 2020 Reinforcement Learning Image classification Duan et al [39] 2020 Data augmentation and rescheduling Image classification Sun et al [22] 2021 Segmented Federated Learning Cybersecurity model parameter number, a trade-off between the two models was demonstrated (Fig. 4 (b)), where the hyperbola shows the regions where one model outperforms the other regarding communication efficiency, in other words, less data transmission between the client and the PS.…”
Section: A Communication Efficiency Under Edge Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%