2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-binding peptides: Binding-upon-folding versus folding-upon-binding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two intramolecular interactions required for TIM auto‐inhibition were defined as self‐binding peptides (SBPs) in previous studies, which can be exploited as therapeutic targets for cancer intervention . We also demonstrated that the TIM auto‐inhibitory state can be relieved by targeting its SH3 domain with rationally designed peptide aptamers, thus indirectly substantiating the dual auto‐inhibition hypothesis described by Yohe et al SH3 domain is a group of small peptide‐recognition modules that can only weakly and transiently interact with natural peptides .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The two intramolecular interactions required for TIM auto‐inhibition were defined as self‐binding peptides (SBPs) in previous studies, which can be exploited as therapeutic targets for cancer intervention . We also demonstrated that the TIM auto‐inhibitory state can be relieved by targeting its SH3 domain with rationally designed peptide aptamers, thus indirectly substantiating the dual auto‐inhibition hypothesis described by Yohe et al SH3 domain is a group of small peptide‐recognition modules that can only weakly and transiently interact with natural peptides .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…[ 41 ] The calculations characterized vacuum Coulombic energy, nonclassical charge‐transfer effect, and van der Waals potential; a linear combination of the QM and MM energy contributions was utilized to partially remove the double counting of the repulsive van der Waals term. [ 42 ] The solvent contribution and conformational flexibility were calculated by classical continuum medium model and conformational free energy analysis, respectively, [ 43,44 ] which have been found to be compatible with QM/MM‐derived protein–ligand interaction energy. [ 27 ] With this strategy, the binding free energies of a kinase–SSBI complex before (Δ G WT ) and after (Δ G MT ) mutation were readily obtained; thus, the binding energy change upon mutation can be expressed as ΔΔ G = Δ G MT − Δ G WT .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entropy contribution was not considered. [41][42][43] Mutation energy (ΔΔG mtt ) is the energetic effect of an EGFR residue mutation on ATP binding energy (ΔG ttl ), namely, the ATP binding energy change upon a missense mutation in EGFR kinase domain, which can be calculated using a thermodynamic cycle scheme. [44] The ΔΔG mtt is expressed as the difference between the binding energies of ATP to wild-type kinase (ΔG ttl wt ) and to mutant kinase (ΔG ttl wt ), where only the ATP molecule and the mutated kinase residue were included in the high-level QM layer.…”
Section: Structural Modeling Of Atp Complexes With Wild-type and Mumentioning
confidence: 99%