1994
DOI: 10.1177/002221949402700407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Concept and Children with Learning Disabilities

Abstract: This study assessed the self-concept of students with learning disabilities (LD), comparing observer ratings and self-reports both within the LD group and across LD, nondisabled, and high-achieving (HA) classes. Using the Multidimensional Self Concept Scale (MSCS) a total of 135 students from the sixth, seventh, and eighth grades rated their self-concepts. Teachers and parents also rated the children's self-concepts using an abbreviated form of the MSCS. Compared to students' ratings, teachers generally undere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from teachers' ratings not only differed from students' own evaluations but also tended to be more negative than students' own rankings. Montgomery (1994) found a greater degree of consistency in the ratings between parents and children with LD than in the ratings between teachers and the children with LD. Moreover, parents and their children with LD gave higher ratings than teachers in most domains of social competence of children with LD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results from teachers' ratings not only differed from students' own evaluations but also tended to be more negative than students' own rankings. Montgomery (1994) found a greater degree of consistency in the ratings between parents and children with LD than in the ratings between teachers and the children with LD. Moreover, parents and their children with LD gave higher ratings than teachers in most domains of social competence of children with LD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, discrepancies in the rating of students with LD have been produced in the few studies utilizing parents as raters. While some studies obtained more consistent and positive results in self-concept and social competence (Haager & Vaughn, 1995;Montgomery, 1994), others discerned parentstudent differences in the rating of students with LD. Particularly noteworthy is the finding that whereas teachers and parents often rate children with LD to have more behavioral and social difficulty than nondisabled peers (Gresham & Reschly, 1986;Margalit & Raviv, 1984), children with LD provide more varied and positive reports about their own self-concept (Ayres & Cooley, 1990;Clever et al, 1992;Kistner & Osborne, 1987;La Greca & Stone, 1990;Rogers & Sakolfske, 1985;cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, if we expand our search and draw from the extant evidence from the studies of children with known behavioural and learning difficulties (LDs), the value of multi-informant assessments and the analyses of concordances between those assessments is seldom disputed [ 17 , 18 ]. For example, in a 1994 study of students with LDs aged between 11 to 16 years, slight to moderate agreements in perceptions of academic performance were found between parent-child, child-teacher, and parent-teacher dyads [ 19 ]. Other studies have focused on agreement across the speech-language assessment (SLA), teacher and family assessments of language ability and/or language intervention need rather than academic success [ 20 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some empirical studies show a moderate degree of parent-adolescent agreement about children's achievement in academic areas such as Math and English (Bornholt & Goodnow, 1999). On the other hand, some studies showed that the level of agreement between parents' perception of their children's competence and children's self-perception differs depending on the area (Epkins, 1998;Montgomery, 1994). For example, the agreement was higher in social and scholastic competence than the areas of athletic skills, physical appearance, and behavioral competence (Epkins, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%