“…Studies by Sarbin and Anderson (1942); Kates (1950); Gadel and Kreidt (1952); Lipsett and Wilson (1954); Weiss, Dawis, England, and Lofquist (1965); Schletzer (1969); Perry and Cannon (1967); Werner (1969); Morrow (1971); Dore and Meacham (1973); Prichard and Peters (1973); Echternacht, Reilly, and McCaffrey (1974); Mount and Muchinsky (1978b); Peiser and Meir (1978); Aranya, Barak, and Amernic (1981); Melamed and Meir (1981); Swaney and Prediger (1985); Smart, Elton, and McLaughlin (1986); Elton and Smart (1988); and Heesacker, Elliott, and Howe (1988), among others, provide only moderate, ambiguous, or contradictory support for the congruence hypothesis. Much of this literature has been summarized by Spokane (1985) and by Assouline and Meir (1987).…”