2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3197034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-consistent computation of electronic and optical properties of a single exciton in a spherical quantum dot via matrix diagonalization method

Abstract: Cataloged from PDF version of article.In this study, we develop and demonstrate an efficient self-consistent calculation schema that computes the electronic structure and optical properties of a single exciton in a spherical quantum dot (QD) with an interacting pair of electron and hole wave functions. To observe modifications on bands, wave functions, and energies due to the attractive Coulomb potential, the full numeric matrix diagonalization technique is employed to determine sublevel energy eigenvalues and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, for the hole (eq. 6), it is calculated by reducing confinement potential of electrons with the difference of band gap between core and shell 33 . Beyond R 2 , the QD is assumed to be in an infinite potential wall, this amounts to a node for the electron and hole wavefunctions at the periphery of the spherical QD.…”
Section: The Model and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, for the hole (eq. 6), it is calculated by reducing confinement potential of electrons with the difference of band gap between core and shell 33 . Beyond R 2 , the QD is assumed to be in an infinite potential wall, this amounts to a node for the electron and hole wavefunctions at the periphery of the spherical QD.…”
Section: The Model and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations 9 and 10 models the electronic potential images which arise due to surface polarization at the core-shell boundaries. The charge carriers (e–h) linear densities are as follows 33 :Here, n represents the principal quantum number and l is the azimuthal quantum number. Since we are concerned with the modelling of s-s transitions for the excitations, therefore we have assumed n = 1 and l = 0 for both the electron as well as a hole.…”
Section: The Model and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the electronic properties of the QDs in detail, we conducted quantum mechanical calculations by solving self-consistently the Poisson–Schrödinger equations in the effective mass approximation and using BenDaniel–Duke boundary conditions 29 . The material parameters used in the calculations are listed in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material parameters used in the calculations are listed in Table 1 . All Coulombic interactions have been taken into account on both energy eigenvalues and wavefunctions 29 . At the end of the calculations, single particle energies of electron and hole and corresponding radial wavefunctions have been determined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material parameters are m * CdSe = 0.13m 0 and m * ZnS = 0.28m 0 , κ CdSe = 9.3 and κ ZnS = 8.1, n r = 2.6, the electron confinement potential is V b = 1.05 eV [38]. Here, the Lorentzian peak width is chosen as Γ ab = 3.28 meV.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%