2021
DOI: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00375-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-consistent methods for structure and production of heavy and superheavy nuclei

Abstract: Self-consistent methods for the structure of heavy and superheavy nuclei are reviewed. The construction and application of energy-density functionals are discussed. The relationship between the self-consistent methods and microscopic-macroscopic approaches is considered on the mean-field level. The extraction of single-particle potentials from the energy-density functional is described. The isotopic dependence of nucleon distributions and its influence on the nucleus-nucleus interaction is analyzed. As a new a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 444 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the large number of SHN already synthesized with different types of cold and hot fusion reactions, there is a limitation in these reactions that produce neutrondeficient isotopes, far away from the predicted location of the most stable SHN, which is unreachable by fusion reactions with stable beams. Predictions of shell closures from macroscopic-microscopic models based on deformed liquid drop models with shell corrections [9][10][11][12] agree with predictions from self-consistent non-relativistic [13][14][15] and relativistic [16,17] mean-field models with effective nuclear interactions that produce shell closures at (Z, N ) = (114, 184), (120, 172), and (126, 184), depending on the effective interaction used. The sensitivity of the shell closures to the properties of the underlying nuclear forces, makes it possible to use SHN as a laboratory to investigate the nuclear force.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Despite the large number of SHN already synthesized with different types of cold and hot fusion reactions, there is a limitation in these reactions that produce neutrondeficient isotopes, far away from the predicted location of the most stable SHN, which is unreachable by fusion reactions with stable beams. Predictions of shell closures from macroscopic-microscopic models based on deformed liquid drop models with shell corrections [9][10][11][12] agree with predictions from self-consistent non-relativistic [13][14][15] and relativistic [16,17] mean-field models with effective nuclear interactions that produce shell closures at (Z, N ) = (114, 184), (120, 172), and (126, 184), depending on the effective interaction used. The sensitivity of the shell closures to the properties of the underlying nuclear forces, makes it possible to use SHN as a laboratory to investigate the nuclear force.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In the present paper, I fix the pairing parameters to reproduce reasonably the data of 244 Cm which are 0.63 and 0.57 MeV for neutrons and protons, respectively. The resultant pairing gaps are 0.65 and 0.59 MeV with V ν 0 = −270 and V π 0 = −310 MeV fm 3 . For the SLy4 functional, I find that the strength V ν 0 = −310 and V π 0 = −320 MeV fm 3 produces the pairing gap as 0.67 and 0.53 MeV for neutrons and protons, respectively.…”
Section: B Numerical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in experimental technology and theoretical modeling have significantly advanced the study of exotic nuclei. The existence of superheavy nuclei in the limit of a great number of protons has long been a subject of interest in nuclear physics [1][2][3]. The shell effect is a key to define their stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4]). It turns out that the existence of the heaviest nuclei with Z > 104 is primarily determined by shell effects due to the quantum-mechanical motion of protons and neutrons inside the nucleus [70,71,72,73,74]. In these nuclei the heights of fission barriers are entirely determined by the shell corrections and they would not exist without shell effects.…”
Section: Superheavy Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although state-of-the-art theoretical models provide a reasonable description of many aspects of the physics of superheavy nuclei, they face substantial challenges in the prediction of the location of next spherical shell closures [31,32,72,73,74,75]. These challenges are illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Superheavy Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%