2019 Electrical Design of Advanced Packaging and Systems (EDAPS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/edaps47854.2019.9011620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Decoupled, 5G NR77/78/79 Two-Antenna System for Notebook Computers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the impedance matching better than −6 dB (VSWR of 3), the reflection coefficients cover the 3.4-3.6 GHz band. Note that the −6 dB impedance is usually defined for 5G mobile antennas as shown in [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Additionally, owing to the orthogonal polarization between the loop's two ports, low transmission coefficient lower than −32 dB is also achieved.…”
Section: Reflection Coefficients Transmission Coefficient and Tarcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the impedance matching better than −6 dB (VSWR of 3), the reflection coefficients cover the 3.4-3.6 GHz band. Note that the −6 dB impedance is usually defined for 5G mobile antennas as shown in [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Additionally, owing to the orthogonal polarization between the loop's two ports, low transmission coefficient lower than −32 dB is also achieved.…”
Section: Reflection Coefficients Transmission Coefficient and Tarcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the one-wavelength dipole mode is decreased toward the half-wavelength mode at about 3.6 GHz and combines with the half-wavelength mode. As a result of two resonant modes of similar magnitude but counter-phases on the half of the shared radiator, 16,20 the common dipole is decoupled. Figure 4(A) shows the measured and the simulated (presented in corresponding dashed lines) S-parameters for the fabricated prototype.…”
Section: Decoupling Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For port1 excitation in the experiments, the counterpart port2 was TABL E 1 Comparison of the MIMO antennas. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Isolation is obtained from the worst case (largest value) for all the bands between the connected to a 50-Ω load. The same setup was applied to the port2 measurement.…”
Section: Decoupling Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, closely-packed antenna elements in the same frequency bands usually su er from high mutual coupling, which degrades the RF sensitivity of the multiantenna system. Numerous decoupling methods have been studied in the literature [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. One often-seen decoupling method is to introduce an additional coupling path between the antennas to counter the original coupling by adding the resonant structure [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%