1980
DOI: 10.2307/3033737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Definition: The Impact of the Relative Performance and Similarity of Others

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
100
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
7
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals even may redefine a dimension as less central to the self if they learn that others are superior on that dimension (Tesser, 1986;Tesser & Campbell, 1980).…”
Section: Selection Of Comparison Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals even may redefine a dimension as less central to the self if they learn that others are superior on that dimension (Tesser, 1986;Tesser & Campbell, 1980).…”
Section: Selection Of Comparison Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that pursuing a managerial career requires a significant time investment (Stone & Lovejoy, 2004), this reasoning also suggests that with time and experience, women leaders increasingly value their leader identity. Self-enhancement motives, whereby individuals assign a greater importance to domains in which they are successful (Taylor & Brown, 1988;Tesser & Campbell, 1980), further suggest that women's positive view of the "leaders" social category is coextensive with their leadership experience. We thus formulate the following hypothesis:…”
Section: Collective Self-esteem Channeling Effect Of Collective Self-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several experiments have found that the value subjects place on activities depends upon how well they perform relative to peers -rather than how well they perform absolutely (see Tesser andCampbell (1980, 1982)). Additionally, recent work by Marsh and coauthors argues that students find it harder to achieve high self-esteem through a focus on academics when peer academic ability is higher (see especially Marsh (2008) and Seaton et al (2009)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%