2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2021.113301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-diffusion coefficients of amines, a molecular dynamics study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then ran the microcanonical NVE ensemble for a further 5 ns until the mean squared displacement data versus time entered a linear region, as recommended in previous literature . The nitrogen diffusivity was estimated to be 0.71 cm 2 /s at 300 K and atmospheric pressure in reasonable enough agreement with an experimental value of 0.212 cm 2 /s as simulated diffusivity could overestimate by 1–9 times of experimental value. The FLARE++ model was able to capture an expected Arrhenius relation between diffusivity and temperature from our extended temperature range from 300 to 2000 K, as shown in Figure . Although diffusion coefficients above 1200 K (around 0.8 on the x -axis) deviate above the linear relation, our single transferable force field is still capable of capturing diffusivity in a gaseous phase over a very large range of temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We then ran the microcanonical NVE ensemble for a further 5 ns until the mean squared displacement data versus time entered a linear region, as recommended in previous literature . The nitrogen diffusivity was estimated to be 0.71 cm 2 /s at 300 K and atmospheric pressure in reasonable enough agreement with an experimental value of 0.212 cm 2 /s as simulated diffusivity could overestimate by 1–9 times of experimental value. The FLARE++ model was able to capture an expected Arrhenius relation between diffusivity and temperature from our extended temperature range from 300 to 2000 K, as shown in Figure . Although diffusion coefficients above 1200 K (around 0.8 on the x -axis) deviate above the linear relation, our single transferable force field is still capable of capturing diffusivity in a gaseous phase over a very large range of temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The calculations of the diffusion coefficients were obtained over the entire production time using the trajectory file and the defaults settings of the GROMACS utilities for the separation of time origins. From table 4 and figure 7 we can see that the diffusion coefficients calculated in this work have significant errors compared to the experiments [36]. Nevertheless, they have better agreement with them than the other force fields reported in the literature [36].…”
Section: -5supporting
confidence: 48%
“…From table 4 and figure 7 we can see that the diffusion coefficients calculated in this work have significant errors compared to the experiments [36]. Nevertheless, they have better agreement with them than the other force fields reported in the literature [36].…”
Section: -5supporting
confidence: 48%
“…The molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is also a common method for studying the self-diffusion of substances, where various properties of the system are calculated at the molecular scale. Castro-Anaya et al 19 reported the application of three different force fields, the optimized potential for liquid simulations of all atoms (OPLS-AA), transferable potentials for phase equilibria explicit hydrogens (TraPPE-EH), and a recent OPLS-AA (new-OPLS-AA) version, to calculate the self-diffusion coefficients of several amines. The new-OPLS-AA force field is a reparameterized version proposed by Dodda et al, 20 in which a scaling factor is used to account for the polarization effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%