Self-efficacy outcomes of people with brain injury in cognitive skill training using different types of trainer–trainee interaction

Man, David; Soong, W Y L; Tam, Sing-Fai; Hui-Chan, C.W.Y.

doi:10.1080/02699050600909789

Cited by 22 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…54,55 Feedback regarding discrepancies between anticipated and actual performance levels is central to changing self-efficacy beliefs, but needs to be adapted to the existing level (high or low) of self-efficacy and the presence of impaired self-awareness. Providing information and feedback on the use of effective strategies to increase self-management of task and situational demands, and self-regulation of cognitive and emotional resources, may be the most direct means of changing selfefficacy beliefs and subsequent performance.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceived Self-Efficacy and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Brain Injury

Cicerone

Azulay

2007

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

176

124

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceived Self-Efficacy and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Brain Injury

Cicerone

Azulay

2007

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

176

124

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The main reason for excluding studies was based on the outcome criteria: the majority of the studies did not measure empowerment or an empowerment-related outcome. From the 18 studies that initially met our inclusion criteria, 2 publications of Man et al [44,45] reported on the same study and were handled as one RCT. The publication of Kukafka et al [46] was excluded because standard deviations of the outcome (self-efficacy) were not reported and were not retrieved after contacting the author.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 14 included studies, 13 were RCTs, while the study that was reported in two publications [44,45] was a quasi-RCT. Most studies compared two study groups: an intervention group in which the treatment was a Web-based intervention and a control group receiving usual care or no care.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Web-based Interventions on Patient Empowerment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Samoocha

Bruinvels²,

Elbers³

et al. 2010

J Med Internet Res

324

226

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundPatient empowerment is growing in popularity and application. Due to the increasing possibilities of the Internet and eHealth, many initiatives that are aimed at empowering patients are delivered online.ObjectiveOur objective was to evaluate whether Web-based interventions are effective in increasing patient empowerment compared with usual care or face-to-face interventions.MethodsWe performed a systematic review by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases from January 1985 to January 2009 for relevant citations. From the 7096 unique citations retrieved from the search strategy, we included 14 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met all inclusion criteria. Pairs of review authors assessed the methodological quality of the obtained studies using the Downs and Black checklist. A meta-analysis was performed on studies that measured comparable outcomes. The GRADE approach was used to determine the level of evidence for each outcome.ResultsIn comparison with usual care or no care, Web-based interventions had a significant positive effect on empowerment measured with the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (2 studies, standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29 - 0.94]), on self-efficacy measured with disease-specific self-efficacy scales (9 studies, SMD = 0.23, 95% CI 0.12 - 0.33), and on mastery measured with the Pearlin Mastery Scale (1 study, mean difference [MD] = 2.95, 95% CI 1.66 - 4.24). No effects were found for self-efficacy measured with general self-efficacy scales (3 studies, SMD = 0.05, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.35) or for self-esteem measured with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (1 study, MD = -0.38, 95% CI -2.45 to 1.69). Furthermore, when comparing Web-based interventions with face-to-face deliveries of the same interventions, no significant (beneficial or harmful) effects were found for mastery (1 study, MD = 1.20, 95% CI -1.73 to 4.13) and self-esteem (1 study, MD = -0.10, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.25).ConclusionsWeb-based interventions showed positive effects on empowerment measured with the Diabetes Empowerment Scale, disease-specific self-efficacy scales and the Pearlin Mastery Scale. Because of the low quality of evidence we found, the results should be interpreted with caution. The clinical relevance of the findings can be questioned because the significant effects we found were, in general, small.

show abstract

“…You pull his tail in New York, and his head is meowing in Los Angeles.” Superficially, a telegraph and a cat have little in common, and yet this analogy conveys an important point about the way in which a local action can have long-distance consequences. Similarly, analogies are used frequently and naturally to communicate ideas in a wide-variety of domains (Holyoak and Thagard 1995), including science (Dunbar 1995) and politics (Blanchette and Dunbar 2001), and their use promotes learning in education (Loewenstein et al 1999) and rehabilitation (Wai-Kwong Man et al 2006). …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bilateral frontoparietal network underlies visuospatial analogical reasoning

Watson

Chatterjee

2012

NeuroImage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our ability to reason by analogy facilitates problem solving and allows us to communicate ideas efficiently. In this study, we examined the neural correlates of analogical reasoning and, more specifically, the contribution of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex (RLPFC) to reasoning. This area of the brain has been hypothesized to integrate relational information, as in analogy, or the outcomes of subgoals, as in multi-tasking and complex problem solving. Using fMRI, we compared visuospatial analogical reasoning to a control task that was as complex and difficult as the analogies and required the coordination of subgoals but not the integration of relations. We found that analogical reasoning more strongly activated bilateral RLPFC, suggesting that anterior prefrontal cortex is preferentially recruited by the integration of relational knowledge. Consistent with the need for inhibition during analogy, bilateral, and particularly right, inferior frontal gyri were also more active during analogy. Finally, greater activity in bilateral inferior parietal cortex during the analogy task is consistent with recent evidence for the neural basis of spatial relation knowledge. Together, these findings indicate that a network of frontoparietal areas underlies analogical reasoning; we also suggest that hemispheric differences may emerge depending on the visuospatial or verbal/semantic nature of the analogies.

show abstract

Self-efficacy outcomes of people with brain injury in cognitive skill training using different types of trainer–trainee interaction

Abstract: Interactive modes of cognitive skill training can be flexible enough to match the needs of individual trainees. However, human interaction is considered important in promoting self-efficacy in trainees with brain injury.

Cited by 22 publications

References 42 publications

Perceived Self-Efficacy and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Brain Injury

Perceived Self-Efficacy and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Brain Injury

Effectiveness of Web-based Interventions on Patient Empowerment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A bilateral frontoparietal network underlies visuospatial analogical reasoning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About