Self-employment: the significance of ability, desire and opportunity

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of ability, desire and opportunity on the individual’s intention to be self-employed. Design/methodology/approach The authors created a database from Swedish national registers consisting of all individuals residing in Sweden sometime during the period 1997-2010 and selected all 333,001 full sibling pairs, 12,810 maternal half sibling pairs and 15,944 paternal half sibling pairs. Three types of entrepreneurs were defined based on information from the Swedish Tax Register. The authors divided the intention to be self-employed into ability and desire and defined ability as a genetic factor and desire as a common family factor. A classical twin model was used to separate the variance of the outcome variables into genetic, common and unshared environmental factors. Findings The study demonstrates that the influence from opportunity on the intention to be self-employed is generally strong and that all factors, ability, desire and opportunity, differ, both in size and content, for the three outcomes of entrepreneurs. Originality/value The authors divide self-employment into three distinct company types, which enables a sophisticated additive genetic analysis of the ability, desire and opportunity to be self-employed. The authors contribute to the understanding of why individuals become self-employed by examining the influences from internal and external factors of family on the intentions of self-employment.

Guest editorial: New technologies and entrepreneurship: exploring entrepreneurial behavior in the digital transformation era

“…For example, recent advances in digital technologies have played a key role in growing a new, digital-based entrepreneurship and the development of related business models (Kraus et al , 2019; Nambisan, 2017). These technologies are having a disruptive impact on entrepreneurship, changing traditional patterns and helping discover new frontiers for entrepreneurs to explore (Broomé and Ohlsson, 2018).…”

Digitalization and strategic flexibility – a recipe for business growth

“…Digital technologies are having a disruptive impact on entrepreneurship and organizational strategies (Mazzei and Noble, 2017; Broome and Ohlsson, 2018; Keding, 2021). They include analytical tools, sharing platforms, the Internet of things, mobile devices and applications (Martin-Pena et al , 2018; Andriole, 2017).…”

Entrepreneurial Intentions: Moving the Field Forwards

“…EIs are a representation of previously concealed latent potential (Broomé & Ohlsson, 2017) that act as a causal precursor to more observable individual actions (Dimov, 2007). Therefore, in the present context, EI is conveyed as a temporally embedded mindful willingness to engage in deliberative processes that both affect and are affected by context (Donaldson, 2019).…”

“…Although most research has revealed and reified each construct’s importance in this regard, there are still some inconsistencies amongst findings. The most prevalent include an incomplete understanding of the impact that social norms have on influencing intentions (Heuer & Liñán, 2013), the fact that our intent does not always translate into action (Gielnik et al, 2014; Rauch & Hulsink, 2015; Shinnar et al, 2018), and finally questions remain over how differences in belief accessibility (and retrieval) could impact on intentional fluctuations (Broomé & Ohlsson, 2017; Meoli et al, 2019; Morris et al, 2012).…”