1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01410659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self energy of heavy quarks in confined QCD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the rate for El transitions is proportional to k3, where k is the photon energy, we have rescaled all El widths using the experimental value kcog(IP) = 119 MeV and kcog(2P) = 9 3 MeV. The agreement between measurements is in fact impressive fo r potential models, poor for the bag model calculations (70), and extremely poor for the QCD sum rules predictions of the lowest 3 p state mass (71, 72). (20).…”
Section: P-wave States and Photon Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since the rate for El transitions is proportional to k3, where k is the photon energy, we have rescaled all El widths using the experimental value kcog(IP) = 119 MeV and kcog(2P) = 9 3 MeV. The agreement between measurements is in fact impressive fo r potential models, poor for the bag model calculations (70), and extremely poor for the QCD sum rules predictions of the lowest 3 p state mass (71, 72). (20).…”
Section: P-wave States and Photon Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…for the 3p level masses and transition rates. Since the rate for El transitions is proportional to k3, where k is the photon energy, we have rescaled all El widths using the experimental value kcog(IP) = 119 MeV and kcog(2P) = 9 3 MeV.The agreement between measurements is in fact impressive fo r potential models, poor for the bag model calculations(70), and extremely poor for the QCD sum rules predictions of the lowest 3 p state mass (71, 72).4.4.3 3p STATES ' CENTER OF GRAVITY AND FLAVOR INDEPENDENCE Quigg…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%