2011
DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2011.562176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-esteem in carers of frail older people: Resentment predicts anxiety and depression

Abstract: The results of this study indicate that those carers who resent having to care for their frail older relative are susceptible to anxiety and depressive symptoms. This study supports the notion that there is a need for assessment of caregiving reactions in carers of frail older people.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aim was to assess whether intervention (program) was more effective than usual geriatric care in preventing falls in frail communitydwelling older fallers, with and without cognitive impairment, and in alleviating subjective caregiver burden in subjects’ CGs.33 dyads consisting of community dwelling older adults who had fallen at least once in the last 6 months and who met at least 2 of the FFS criteria, and their informal caregivers.No sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age) reported.All CRs able to walk at least 15 m independently with or without walking aid.All CRs had life expectancy >12 months.All CRs had MMSE >15.Mean age (intervention/control); 67.3 ± 13.1/64.3 ± 14.3Female gender (intervention/control); 50/67%Living with CR (intervention/control); 55/47%Baseline ZBI (intervention/control); 5.2/6.0Total caregiving hours per week (intervention/control); 8.0/10.5Kim 2008 [30]USACross-sectionalTele-survey-based study comparing caregiving burden and distress, among CGs of 4 types of CRs: cancer, diabetes, dementia, frail older adults.606 CGs across all 4 groups, including 135 caregivers (“frail elderly” group) of CRs whom their CG described as “frail due to age.”(“Frail elderly” group only)Mean age; 81.69 ± 9.77(“Frail elderly” group only)Mean age; 46.23 ± 14.99Female gender; 47.4%Relationship to CR;Spouse/partner; 0.7%Child/in-law; 50.4%Sibling/in-law; 1.5%Grandchild/in-law; 18.5%Friend/neighbor/nonrelative; 17.8%Other; 11.1%

*This publication represents the index study for a series of five papers by a single set of investigators [2226]. An explanation of the relationship between these articles appears in the “Results” section of the manuscript** Care recipient demographics were not reported in this paper [25]; these details were extracted from Aggar 2011b, which involves the same population [24].

…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Aim was to assess whether intervention (program) was more effective than usual geriatric care in preventing falls in frail communitydwelling older fallers, with and without cognitive impairment, and in alleviating subjective caregiver burden in subjects’ CGs.33 dyads consisting of community dwelling older adults who had fallen at least once in the last 6 months and who met at least 2 of the FFS criteria, and their informal caregivers.No sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age) reported.All CRs able to walk at least 15 m independently with or without walking aid.All CRs had life expectancy >12 months.All CRs had MMSE >15.Mean age (intervention/control); 67.3 ± 13.1/64.3 ± 14.3Female gender (intervention/control); 50/67%Living with CR (intervention/control); 55/47%Baseline ZBI (intervention/control); 5.2/6.0Total caregiving hours per week (intervention/control); 8.0/10.5Kim 2008 [30]USACross-sectionalTele-survey-based study comparing caregiving burden and distress, among CGs of 4 types of CRs: cancer, diabetes, dementia, frail older adults.606 CGs across all 4 groups, including 135 caregivers (“frail elderly” group) of CRs whom their CG described as “frail due to age.”(“Frail elderly” group only)Mean age; 81.69 ± 9.77(“Frail elderly” group only)Mean age; 46.23 ± 14.99Female gender; 47.4%Relationship to CR;Spouse/partner; 0.7%Child/in-law; 50.4%Sibling/in-law; 1.5%Grandchild/in-law; 18.5%Friend/neighbor/nonrelative; 17.8%Other; 11.1%

*This publication represents the index study for a series of five papers by a single set of investigators [2226]. An explanation of the relationship between these articles appears in the “Results” section of the manuscript** Care recipient demographics were not reported in this paper [25]; these details were extracted from Aggar 2011b, which involves the same population [24].

…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An explanation of the relationship between these articles appears in the “Results” section of the manuscript** Care recipient demographics were not reported in this paper [25]; these details were extracted from Aggar 2011b, which involves the same population [24]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12-16 Similar findings are reported in caregivers of frail older people and cancer patients. 17, 18 Optimism is defined as a general expectation for positive rather than negative experiences in the future. 8, 19 Optimism and psychological distress have been found to be related in persons with a variety of medical conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%