1985
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198501000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-evaluation in undergraduate medical education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
96
5
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
96
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Arnold et al found that the correlation of selfassessment to external evaluation decreased over time, 25 while Fitzgerald et al showed self-assessment to be a stable characteristic that was less accurate in a new environment (eg, from classroom to clinical setting), where performance was poorer in comparison with a familiar activity. 26 This may be relevant to our research because students had limited experience with the task of counseling in their first year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arnold et al found that the correlation of selfassessment to external evaluation decreased over time, 25 while Fitzgerald et al showed self-assessment to be a stable characteristic that was less accurate in a new environment (eg, from classroom to clinical setting), where performance was poorer in comparison with a familiar activity. 26 This may be relevant to our research because students had limited experience with the task of counseling in their first year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible reason for the absence of consistent improvement in the initial survey item ratings is progressive underestimation by students of their abilities over time. Some studies have shown that medical students tend to underestimate or produce more conservative self-assessments of knowledge or performance when assessments are repeated over time, 16,17 with this phenomenon being more pronounced among higher achievers. 17 However, since all selfassessments ratings improved significantly from the first day to the last day of the drug information APPE, and no significant differences were observed in the end ratings based upon when the drug information APPE was completed, this explanation is unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,[10][11][12][13][14]16,17 There are several reasons for the unpredictable findings from self-assessment studies, including variability in their methods. The 3 primary methodological approaches used in studies of self-ratings involve analyzing the correlations between self-assessment scores and an external measure, determining the proportion of self-ratings that correspond to expert ratings, and comparing the actual values, such as mean scores, between self-ratings and an external measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enfin, notre étude s'est limitée à apprécier le contenu des autoévaluations des étudiants. La régulation qui devrait en découler dans la pratique professionnelle [24,25] n'a pas été étudiée dans cette étude.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified