2000
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2000.107709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-expandable metal coil stents in the treatment of benign esophageal strictures refractory to conventional therapy: a case series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been a few reports describing the use of metallic stents for benign esophageal strictures refractory to conventional treatment [4,13]. However, the use of metal stents for such benign strictures has been associated with a high delayed complication rate [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a few reports describing the use of metallic stents for benign esophageal strictures refractory to conventional treatment [4,13]. However, the use of metal stents for such benign strictures has been associated with a high delayed complication rate [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, patients with severe and refractory benign anastomotic strictures have been treated with self-expandable metal stents [3,11,13]. However, both acute and chronic complications (bleeding, perforation, migration) and the cost of this procedure may limit the unrestricted use of this technique [3,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean length was 6.1 mm (range, 3-10). The mean diameter of the strictures was 5.2 mm (range, [3][4][5][6][7][8]. All colorectal strictures were located 5 to 16 cm from the anal sphincter.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reports show that SEMS are associated with high rates of complications. The most commonly reported are stent migration occurring in 12.5-31%, new stricture formation in 20-100% and fistula formation in 6-33% of patients (Sandha & Marcon, 1999;Fiorini et al, 2000;Ackroyd et al, 2001;Wadhwa et al, 2003). Stent migration is more likely to occur with covered stents while uncovered stents or partially covered stents become embedded in the tissue making their removal difficult and traumatic.…”
Section: Stents For Benign Oesophageal Peptic Stricturesmentioning
confidence: 99%