2000
DOI: 10.1086/308609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐gravitating Gaseous Bars. I. Compressible Analogs of Riemann Ellipsoids with Supersonic Internal Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to Hawley et al (1999) Coriolis forces are able to stabilize differentially rotating astrophysical flows against shearing instabilities even in accretion disks in which the shear is much stronger than in our Dedekind-like bar (see, however, Longaretti 2002 for an opposing argument). Furthermore, other models of differentially rotating astrophysical bars (Cazes & Tohline 2000;New et al 2000) do not appear to be susceptible to the dynamical instability that destroyed the bar in our ROT181 model evolution. We suspect, instead, that the latetime behavior of model ROT181 results either from nonlinear coupling of various oscillatory modes within the star or from an ''elliptic flow'' instability similar to the one identified in laboratory fluids that are forced to flow along elliptical streamlines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, according to Hawley et al (1999) Coriolis forces are able to stabilize differentially rotating astrophysical flows against shearing instabilities even in accretion disks in which the shear is much stronger than in our Dedekind-like bar (see, however, Longaretti 2002 for an opposing argument). Furthermore, other models of differentially rotating astrophysical bars (Cazes & Tohline 2000;New et al 2000) do not appear to be susceptible to the dynamical instability that destroyed the bar in our ROT181 model evolution. We suspect, instead, that the latetime behavior of model ROT181 results either from nonlinear coupling of various oscillatory modes within the star or from an ''elliptic flow'' instability similar to the one identified in laboratory fluids that are forced to flow along elliptical streamlines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…If a star rotates sufficiently fast, to a point where the ratio of its rotational to gravitational potential energy T /jW j k 0:27, it will encounter a dynamical bar-mode instability that will result in the deformation of the star into a rapidly spinning, barlike structure. This instability has been verified by a number of numerical hydrodynamics investigations ( Tohline et al 1985;Durisen et al 1986;Williams & Tohline 1988;Cazes & Tohline 2000;New et al 2000;Brown 2000;Liu 2002). At a slower rotation rate, T /jW j k 0:14, a star may also encounter a secular bar-mode instability that can promote deformation into a barlike shape, but only if the star is subjected to a dissipative process capable of redistributing angular momentum within its structure, such as viscosity or gravitational radiation reaction (GRR) forces (Chandrasekhar 1970;Friedman & Schutz 1978;Ipser & Lindblom 1990, 1991Lai & Shapiro 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The ultimate outcome of I and J mode instabilities appears to be quasi-stable, damping nonaxisymmetric figures. The further evolution of the figures will be driven by cooling and may lead to the onset of elliptical instabilities and eventually to fission in the scenario described in Lebovitz 1987 (see also, Lebovitz andLifschitz 1996;Cazes and Tohline 2000;Ou et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%