1988
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.5.001322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-imaging with nonparabolic approximation of spherical wave fronts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simple equation Eq. (1), which assumes the ideal case of zero divergence, is corrected for the spherical-wave beam with a non-zero divergence in the following formula: zT=md2λz0z0md2λ(m=1,2,3),where z0 represents the distance between the x-ray source and slits 28 . It follows that the optimal distance z for a spherical wave is larger than that derived with Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simple equation Eq. (1), which assumes the ideal case of zero divergence, is corrected for the spherical-wave beam with a non-zero divergence in the following formula: zT=md2λz0z0md2λ(m=1,2,3),where z0 represents the distance between the x-ray source and slits 28 . It follows that the optimal distance z for a spherical wave is larger than that derived with Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where z 0 represents the distance between the x-ray source and slits. 28 It follows that the optimal distance z for a spherical wave is larger than that derived with Eq. ( 1).…”
Section: One-dimensional Imagingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…where A 0 and A 1 are constant amplitudes. The intensity of the diffraction pattern in the Fresnel zone at illumination with a point source located at distance d in front of the SAG is given by [42]…”
Section: B Comparison With a Sinusoidal Amplitude Gratingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 gives the intensity distribution behind the grating with L = 0.025 cm along the xand z-axes depending on the distance (s) between the point source and the grating. The diffraction pattern is calculated for illumination with a spherical wave at paraxial approximation [29] for λ = 790 nm. As can be seen, at s = 7 cm there is no Talbot plane, at s = 12 cm the plane is only one, whereas at s = 30 cm the Talbot planes are three.…”
Section: Frequency Content Of Diffraction Pattern From a Sinusoidal Pmentioning
confidence: 99%