Self-Incentives Uniquely Boost Cessation in Community-Based Stop Smoking Programs: Randomized Controlled Trial

Brown, Edith; Smith, Debbie; Armitage, Christopher J.

doi:10.1093/abm/kay056

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our view, implementation intentions are best considered “delivery devices” insofar as they can be used to ensure that behavior change techniques are deployed at appropriate times and places, as described above and including “coping plans” (listed under “problem solving” BCTTv1 1.2 in the taxonomy). Thus, in addition to action plans (BCTTv1 1.4) and coping plans (BCTTv1 1.2), self-incentives (BCTTv1 10.7) have been deployed using implementation intentions (Armitage, 2014; Brown, Smith, & Armitage, 2018), as have valued self-identities (BCTTv1 13.4; Armitage, Harris, & Arden, 2011; Armitage, Rowe, Arden, & Harris, 2014), among numerous other behavior change techniques (Armitage, 2008). Indeed, in one of the studies included in the present review, van Osch et al (2008) refer to their intervention as a “coping planning intervention” (p. 528) but is actually framed in terms of an if-then plan or implementation intention.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond “planning”: A meta-analysis of implementation intentions to support smoking cessation.

McWilliams¹,

Bellhouse²,

Yorke³

et al. 2019

Health Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond “planning”: A meta-analysis of implementation intentions to support smoking cessation.

McWilliams¹,

Bellhouse²,

Yorke³

et al. 2019

Health Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Knowledge about how each behaviour change technique interacts with the others would not only help developers of interventions, but may also lead to new theoretical insights by allowing one to test existing theories or develop new theories on the basis of the evidence. Moreover, identifying underutilization of effective behaviour change techniques could yield some ‘quick wins’ for rapid improvements in the effectiveness of behaviour change interventions (Brown, Smith, & Armitage, 2019).…”

Section: Current Use Of the Bcttv1mentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating which behaviour change techniques work for whom in which contexts delivered by what means: Proposal for an international collaboratory of Centres for Understanding Behaviour Change (CUBiC)

Armitage

Conner

Prestwich

et al. 2020

British J Health Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. Behaviour change techniques are fundamental to the development of any behaviour change intervention, but surprisingly little is known about their properties. Key questions include when, why, how, in which contexts, for which behaviours, in what combinations, compared with what, and for whom behaviour change techniques are typically effective. The aims of the present paper are to: (1) articulate the scope of the challenge in understanding the properties of behaviour change techniques, (2) propose means by which to tackle this problem, and (3) call scientists to action. Methods. Iterative consensus (O'Connor et al., 2020, Br. J. Psychol., e12468) was used to elicit and distil the judgements of experts on how best to tackle the problem of understanding the nature and operation of behaviour change techniques.Results. We propose a worldwide network of 'Centres for Understanding Behaviour Change' (CUBiC) simultaneously undertaking research to establish what are the single and combined properties of behaviour change techniques across multiple behaviours and populations. We additionally provide a first attempt to systematize an approach thatThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

show abstract

Proof of concept trial for a new theory-based intervention to promote child and adult behavior change

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interventions to change children's behavior typically target adults or children, but rarely both. The aims were to: (a) evaluate acceptability and feasibility of an innovative theory-based intervention designed to change both child and adult behavior, and (b) generate effect sizes for a definitive randomized controlled trial. The oral health of sixty children aged 5-9 years with a repaired cleft lip and/or palate was assessed before randomization to one of three conditions: (a) control group, (b) intervention group in which children and adults were asked to form implementation intentions, or (c) intervention plus booster group in which adults were additionally sent a reminder about the implementation intentions they and their children formed. Oral health assessments were repeated at 6-month followup alongside exit interviews. The procedures proved popular and participants exposed to the intervention additionally reported believing that forming implementation intentions was effective. Descriptive statistics generally showed oral health improvements across all conditions, although the effects were more marked in the intervention plus booster condition, where plaque improved by 44.53%, gingivitis improved by 20.00% and free sugar consumption improved by 8.92% (vs. 6.43% improvement, 15.00% deterioration and 15.58% improvement in the control group, respectively). Data collection procedures were acceptable and the intervention feasible. The effect sizes suggest that the intervention plus booster condition has sufficient promise to proceed to a fully-powered randomized controlled trial. The intervention has the potential to be adapted to tackle other child health behaviors and to be deployed at scale. Keywords Implementation intention Á Behavior change Á Randomized controlled trial Á Cleft lip Á Cleft palate Á Children Á Paediatrics Á Feasibility Á Parents Á Carers Á Oral health

show abstract

Self-Incentives Uniquely Boost Cessation in Community-Based Stop Smoking Programs: Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: ISRCTN11610200.

Cited by 6 publications

References 45 publications

Beyond “planning”: A meta-analysis of implementation intentions to support smoking cessation.

Beyond “planning”: A meta-analysis of implementation intentions to support smoking cessation.

Investigating which behaviour change techniques work for whom in which contexts delivered by what means: Proposal for an international collaboratory of Centres for Understanding Behaviour Change (CUBiC)

Proof of concept trial for a new theory-based intervention to promote child and adult behavior change

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About