2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.117.137201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Induced Glassiness and Pattern Formation in Spin Systems Subject to Long-Range Interactions

Abstract: We study the glass formation in two- and three-dimensional Ising and Heisenberg spin systems subject to competing interactions and uniaxial anisotropy with a mean-field approach. In three dimensions, for sufficiently strong anisotropy the systems always modulate in a striped phase. Below a critical strength of the anisotropy, a glassy phase exists in a finite range of temperature, and it becomes more stable as the system becomes more isotropic. In two dimensions the criticality is always avoided and the glassy… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(102 reference statements)
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For α= 2.5, the Q-histogram is characterized by four peaks, at non-zero Q values, each along either the negative/positive Q x or Q y axis. The corresponding picture in real space, as illustrated in in figure 3, is that there are many low lying metastable states with no clear long-range ordered pattern, similar to previously observed self-induced glasses [22,23]. Therefore, we identify this regime as the SQG regime.…”
Section: Q-space and Energy Histograms As Regime Identifierssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For α= 2.5, the Q-histogram is characterized by four peaks, at non-zero Q values, each along either the negative/positive Q x or Q y axis. The corresponding picture in real space, as illustrated in in figure 3, is that there are many low lying metastable states with no clear long-range ordered pattern, similar to previously observed self-induced glasses [22,23]. Therefore, we identify this regime as the SQG regime.…”
Section: Q-space and Energy Histograms As Regime Identifierssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Here, we propose that an ordered and finite 2D array of Ising spins interacting via a well-defined long-range RKKY interaction [21] can be used to create energy landscapes with a tunable level of complexity. By changing the ratio α=λ/a between the RKKY wavelength (λ) and the lattice constant (a), the energy landscape of the spin array can be tuned between three different magnetic regimes, ranging from a regime with double-well potential (DW), through a multi-well potential (MW) regime, to a spin glass-like regime, similar to what has been previously studied in [22,23]. We refer to this regime as a spin-Q glass (SQG) (figure 1) [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Certain types of competing interactions result in the formation of glassy states as captured in the concept of self-induced glassiness ( 60 62 ). For example, for magnetic stripe domains, quasi-chaotic patterns result from competition between short-range but strong exchange interaction which tend to maximize magnetization, both locally and globally, and long-range but weak dipole–dipole interaction requiring that the total magnetization of the system be equal to zero ( 61 ).…”
Section: Glasses Patterns Frustrated States and Socmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the formal criteria of the glass state is “universal flexibility” ( 68 ). Because this is the criterion used in the theory of self-induced glassiness ( 60 62 ) that is directly relevant for the present analysis, it merits a brief description. Consider a configuration (of spins, atomic positions, dipolar moments, or other parameters) that is characterized by a function , where x is a d- dimensional vector characterizing a position in space (in most physical applications, d = 2 or 3).…”
Section: Glasses Patterns Frustrated States and Socmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original glass concept was developed for disordered systems with some type of randomness in the interatomic interactions. Actually, such randomness is not essential as clearly demonstrated in the concept of self-induced glassiness [65][66][67]. It turns out that some systems satisfy the criterion of Eq.…”
Section: Life Glasses and Patterns: Frustrated Systems And Biologicamentioning
confidence: 99%