2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2006.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-induced instabilities of premixed flames in a multiple injection configuration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are due to a resonant coupling of the unsteady heat release and the acoustics propagating in the system and their prediction has become an important task to prevent their appearance at an early design stage [18][19][20]. For acoustically compact flames the linear analysis of combustion instabilities is generally performed with the Flame Transfer Function (FTF) introduced by Crocco [21,22] and more recently with the Flame Describing Function (FDF) [23,24]. In these approaches the FTF is defined as the relative heat release fluctuation ðq=qÞ to the relative inlet velocity perturbation ðû=uÞ induced by the acoustic field:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are due to a resonant coupling of the unsteady heat release and the acoustics propagating in the system and their prediction has become an important task to prevent their appearance at an early design stage [18][19][20]. For acoustically compact flames the linear analysis of combustion instabilities is generally performed with the Flame Transfer Function (FTF) introduced by Crocco [21,22] and more recently with the Flame Describing Function (FDF) [23,24]. In these approaches the FTF is defined as the relative heat release fluctuation ðq=qÞ to the relative inlet velocity perturbation ðû=uÞ induced by the acoustic field:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the flame TF is measured inside the burner deck or close above the slit outlet then the relation between the local velocity and acoustic velocity in a plane wave in the burner upstream part should be incorporated. In [13,30] (Fig. 4), slit width (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The cause of the amplification of the response over its quasi-steady value lies in the interference between perturbations which originate from the anchoring point and travel along the flame, and a convective perturbation of the flow pattern [29]. A TF gain above 1 was also measured for multiple flame burner heads [15,30]. At the same time, both the theoretical and the experimental TF of a single conical flame shows a TF gain less than 1 for the whole frequency range.…”
Section: The Genesis Of Thermo-acoustic Models Of Premixed Bunsen-typmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, let us restrict the dataset to compare the instability of only one frequency (or mode) per parameter setting, as is regularly done in literature, e.g. [10]. This means that in case multiple frequency components, or modes, are present in either the simulated or experimental datasets, one should select only one pair for the comparison and further quality assessment.…”
Section: Model Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10,11] for example, (in) stability experiments on a laboratory combustor were compared to a linear, and later a nonlinear model [9] by varying the length of the upstream duct. In all mentioned literature however [9][10][11], the model quality was inferred from comparing the visual discrepancy of the predictions versus the experimental points. Although such an approach gives a reasonable qualitative indication it remains difficult to answer important quantitative questions such as:' What is the likelihood a stable prediction will be correct?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%