2020
DOI: 10.1002/da.23016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐injurious thoughts and behaviors that differentiate soldiers who attempt suicide from those with recent suicide ideation

Abstract: MD, MPH USAPHC and Kenneth Cox, MD, MPH USAPHC) collaborated to develop the study protocol and data collection instruments, supervise data collection, interpret results, and prepare reports. Although a draft of this manuscript was submitted to the Army and NIMH for review and comment prior to submission, this was with the understanding that comments would be no more than advisory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now clear that suicidal behaviors are genetically complex—as are most neuropsychiatric traits (Wendt, Pathak, Tylee, Goswami, & Polimanti, 2020)—and the evidence suggests that many common variants each of small effect contribute to risk (with the possibility of rare variants conferring greater risk) (Sokolowski & Wasserman, 2020). Epidemiological studies have taught us that risk factors for various aspects of self‐harm (i.e., ideation, attempts, and deaths) are only partially overlapping (Naifeh et al, 2020; Nock et al, 2013), and that a one‐model‐fits‐all scenario is unlikely to be accurate. These lessons have filtered down to the genetic epidemiological study of self‐harm where, increasingly, studies are each centered on one stage or type of self‐harm (e.g., suicide ideation; SAs; violent SAs; and suicide deaths).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now clear that suicidal behaviors are genetically complex—as are most neuropsychiatric traits (Wendt, Pathak, Tylee, Goswami, & Polimanti, 2020)—and the evidence suggests that many common variants each of small effect contribute to risk (with the possibility of rare variants conferring greater risk) (Sokolowski & Wasserman, 2020). Epidemiological studies have taught us that risk factors for various aspects of self‐harm (i.e., ideation, attempts, and deaths) are only partially overlapping (Naifeh et al, 2020; Nock et al, 2013), and that a one‐model‐fits‐all scenario is unlikely to be accurate. These lessons have filtered down to the genetic epidemiological study of self‐harm where, increasingly, studies are each centered on one stage or type of self‐harm (e.g., suicide ideation; SAs; violent SAs; and suicide deaths).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In military populations, Kimbrel et al (2016) found that among Iraq/Afghanistan veterans, half of whom were diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), those who reported a history of NSSI were more likely to report a history of suicide attempts than veterans without a history of NSSI. A study conducted by Naifeh et al (2020) found that a history of NSSI differentiated active duty soldiers with a recent suicide attempt from those with a history of suicidal ideation who did not attempt. A prospective study conducted by Bryan et al (2015) found that NSSI predicted suicide attempts in a sample of active duty soldiers receiving outpatient treatment for suicidal ideation and/or a recent suicide attempt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariate risk score 1 (RS-1) includes sociodemographic variables (gender, age, race, education, marital status). Covariate selection for the remaining three risk scores was based on previously published findings (Naifeh et al, 2019(Naifeh et al, , 2020 in which we systematically identified SAQ-based risk factors associated with SA in the parent sample. Multivariate risk score 2 (RS-2) differentiated SA from the general population (Naifeh et al, 2019) and includes sociodemographic, stressful event, and mental disorder variables.…”
Section: Multivariate Risk Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RS-3 includes gender, education, PTSD, and intermittent explosive disorder (IED) (Naifeh et al, 2019). RS-4 expanded the RS-3 model by adding to it previous self-injurious thoughts/behaviors: history of suicide plan/intention, controllability of worst-week suicide ideation, and frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury (Naifeh et al, 2020) (see Supplemental Materials for more details about the risk scores).…”
Section: Multivariate Risk Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation