Self-interest and Altruism: Pluralism as a Basis for Leadership in Business

Abstract

The paper outlines the case for pluralism between self-interest (egoism) and altruism in business leadership. Scientific progression demonstrating pluralism is discussed, providing a multidisciplinary view of pluralism from evolutionary biology, psychology, moral philosophy, economic theory and organisational behavior. Findings show that myopic views of self-interest and altruism were once dominant in a number of fields however shifts in contemporary theory have provided a basis for pluralism in business leadership. Pluralism is yet to find grounding in leadership ethics, which still widely views "good leadership" through the lens of altruistic orientations. For leaders in business, the relevance of both self-interest and altruistic orientations are described. The paper seeks to address the divide between self-interest and altruism for business leaders, advocating for a realistic and pragmatic pluralistic approach to guide future research.

Self-Sacrificial Leadership and Employee Behaviours: An Examination of the Role of Organizational Social Capital

“…Ethical actions are those that transcend self-interest and promote the common good (Carson, 2003;Sachdeva et al, 2015). Hence, self-sacrifice is regarded as an essential part of the human moral structure and is believed to be the basis for ethical decisions (Joseph, 2015). It is also considered a "powerful signal" for the strength of moral or ethical positions (Sachdeva et al, 2015; 2).…”

Phillip Morris International, Inc.: A Case of Difficulties in Justifying Corporate Social Responsibility

“…For PMI to change smoker's habits from traditional smoking to e-cigarettevapingthere needs to be an "enlightened selfinterest" by balancing social, economic, and environmental factors (Carroll & Shabana, 2010;Smith, 2011). Moreover, enlightened self-interest applies to both personaland corporate level, underlining shared interest with the emphasis on relationships, community, and social values as well as interest that are mainly altruistic (Abrahamsson, 2003;Joseph, 2015).The latter value predominantly focuses on interests that are merely other's, which one follows only out of a sense of stewardship, ethics, or morality (Ikerd, 1999;Joseph, 2015). Ikerd (1999) further denoted that the three previously mentioned interests contribute to well-being or quality of life, as well as taking on the responsibility to take on stakeholder's trust.…”