2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-limiting paratransgenesis

Abstract: Presently, the principal tools to combat malaria are restricted to killing the parasite in infected people and killing the mosquito vector to thwart transmission. While successful, these approaches are losing effectiveness in view of parasite resistance to drugs and mosquito resistance to insecticides. Clearly, new approaches to fight this deadly disease need to be developed. Recently, one such approach-engineering mosquito resident bacteria to secrete anti-parasite compounds-has proven in the laboratory to be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…stephensi Serratia AS1 -mCherry and AS1 -gfp Semi-field simulation of transgenic bacteria spread [ 120 ] R. prolixus R. rhodnii and Gordona rubropertinctus Model showing negligible risk of horizontal transfer of transgenic bacteria [ 133 ] An. stephensi Serratia ASI -gfp + mCheery and kanR genes/+ microbiome in vivo No horizontal transfer of transgenic bacteria genetic material in vivo [ 134 , 162 ] Anopheles spp. P. agglomerans Modelling paratransgensisi b [ 130 ] An.…”
Section: Development Requirements and Recent Advances Of The Paratran...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…stephensi Serratia AS1 -mCherry and AS1 -gfp Semi-field simulation of transgenic bacteria spread [ 120 ] R. prolixus R. rhodnii and Gordona rubropertinctus Model showing negligible risk of horizontal transfer of transgenic bacteria [ 133 ] An. stephensi Serratia ASI -gfp + mCheery and kanR genes/+ microbiome in vivo No horizontal transfer of transgenic bacteria genetic material in vivo [ 134 , 162 ] Anopheles spp. P. agglomerans Modelling paratransgensisi b [ 130 ] An.…”
Section: Development Requirements and Recent Advances Of The Paratran...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… P. agglomerans Modelling paratransgensisi b [ 130 ] An. stephensi Serratia ASI -gfp + mCheery and kanR genes/+ microbiome in vivo Transiently expressed plasmids for checking environmental safety of released genes [ 134 ] An. stephensi Asaia + scorpine Transgene only expressed after blood meal, thus reducing fitness costs [ 126 ] R. prolixus R. rhodnii and Escherichia coli expressing dsRNA RNAi and knockdown of vector genes c [ 74 , 111 ] Anopheles spp.…”
Section: Development Requirements and Recent Advances Of The Paratran...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Paratransgenesis is compatible with both traditional and other genetic control methods [37], while having the potential for self-sustained or self-limiting effect according to the stability of the recombinant DNA and transmission rate of the symbiont. Examples of well-characterized paratransgenic systems include: the bacteria Rhodococcus rhodnii engineered to express Cecropin A to interfere with Trypanosoma cruzi in the triatomine bug Rhodnius prolixus, vector of Chagas disease [23]; Sodalis glossinidius, a natural symbiont of Glossina spp., vector of African trypanosomiasis [22]; Anopheles stephensi and Anopheles gambiae recolonized by engineered strains of Escherichia coli [24,29], Pantoea agglomerans [25,30], Asaia [26][27][28]38] and Serratia [39,40]. Confined semi-field studies employing Asaia in the two major malaria vectors A. stephensi and A. gambiae [41] have outlined key aspects regarding the behavioral ecology of paratransgenic mosquitoes and the transmission dynamics of the engineered symbiont in the vector population, through both horizontal (co-feeding and/or mating) and vertical (maternal and/or paternal inheritance) routes [42,43].…”
Section: Paratransgenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate the environmental impact (i.e., any undesired outcome such as the spread of recombinant microorganisms to non-targeted organisms or horizontal gene transfer), several technologies are being investigated. These include self-limiting paratransgenic systems in which the engineered symbiont reverts to a wild-type status at a predetermined rate [39] and microcapsule-based delivery strategies, which implies the release of the microorganism into the targeted organ of the insect [44]. An advantage of paratransgenesis over other control strategies is that the microorganisms used are relatively easy to isolate, engineer, and reintroduce into the vector and they can be produced at scale at an exceptionally low cost [36].…”
Section: Paratransgenesismentioning
confidence: 99%