2012 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings 2012
DOI: 10.1109/i2mtc.2012.6229702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-mixing sensor for real-time measurement of harmonic and arbitrary displacements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, SM signals have been processed in real-time by using the consecutive samples based unwrapping (CSU) method [11] having a measurement precision of λ/8 where λ is the LD wavelength. Note that as mentioned in [13], such precision can only be achieved if:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this paper, SM signals have been processed in real-time by using the consecutive samples based unwrapping (CSU) method [11] having a measurement precision of λ/8 where λ is the LD wavelength. Note that as mentioned in [13], such precision can only be achieved if:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When input SM signal convolves with impulse response of MF1 it gives high amplitudes where forward fringes occur in input SM signal on same time axis as shown in Figure 1b, whereas high amplitudes are obtained at the output of MF2 wherever backward fringes occur in input SM signal as shown in Figure 1c. However it is worth-mentioning that the shown output of MF2 is actually inverted as it is a requirement of phase unwrapping methods [4][5][6][7]. A nice performance of DBT method significantly degrades for a low SNR SM signal (presented in Figure 2a).…”
Section: Selection Of Mf Templatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, SM fringe detection becomes a fundamental step which is later built upon by these PUMs. Usually, simple derivative based threshold (DBT) method is sufficient to detect SM fringes [4,5]. However, such a simple approach fails in case of either low signal to noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basic theory of the self-mixing effect is explained by the presence of two Fabry-Perot cavities whose parameters are sensitive to variations of the external cavity length and frequency shift of the back-scattered light [8][9][10]. The light from the LD is focused on the remote target and undergoes a Doppler frequency shift proportional to the target surface orthogonal velocity.…”
Section: Self-mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%