2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-optimizing control – A survey

Abstract: Self-optimizing control is a strategy for selecting controlled variables. It is distinguished by the fact that an economic objective function is adopted as a selection criterion. The aim is to systematically select the controlled variables such that by controlling them at constant setpoints, the impact of uncertain and varying disturbances on the economic optimality is minimized. If such a selection leads to an acceptable economic loss compared to perfectly optimal operation then the chosen control structure i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(120 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5,6] As an example, Wenzel et al [7] proposed an application of this hierarchical optimization system to coordinate the optimization of a large scale central energy facility relating to the energy consumption and participation in demand response programs. Jäschke and Skogestad [8] classified the approaches for optimal process into three categories: (a) model used online (eg, real-time optimization (RTO) [9] ; (b) model used offline (eg, self-optimizing control (SOC)) [10] ; and, (c) explicit model not used, but in this case a necessary conditions of optimality (eg, NCO-tracking). [11] All of these categories are measure dependent and/or model dependent, that is, they depend on online measurements and accurate plant models to estimate the best economic profit and send targets/set-points to the plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,6] As an example, Wenzel et al [7] proposed an application of this hierarchical optimization system to coordinate the optimization of a large scale central energy facility relating to the energy consumption and participation in demand response programs. Jäschke and Skogestad [8] classified the approaches for optimal process into three categories: (a) model used online (eg, real-time optimization (RTO) [9] ; (b) model used offline (eg, self-optimizing control (SOC)) [10] ; and, (c) explicit model not used, but in this case a necessary conditions of optimality (eg, NCO-tracking). [11] All of these categories are measure dependent and/or model dependent, that is, they depend on online measurements and accurate plant models to estimate the best economic profit and send targets/set-points to the plant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some artificial intelligence techniques are also employed for the global SOC method [30,31]. For more detailed information about the SOC method, readers are referred to an overview of the state-of-the-art and open issues in the development of SOC by Jaschke [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach could be successfully used in the self-optimizing control context, where the aim is to systematically select the controlled variables (CVs) such that, by controlling them at constant setpoints, the impact of uncertain and varying disturbances on the economic optimality is minimized. 18 In this scenario, the optimal input can be computed as a combination of individually optimal inputs after a proper choice of CVs has been made. If the CVs might change, the proposed modular approach allows to update the optimal controller by simply replacing the related output components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%