2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(99)00081-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-organization of orientation maps in a formal neuron model using a cluster learning rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here the cluster learning rule means that a synaptic connection between a presynaptic and a postsynaptic neuron is strengthened by the simultaneous activation of the presynaptic neuron and of neurons located near the postsynaptic neuron. A Self-Consistent Monte Carlo (SCMC) method with the use of both an inhibitory neuron pool and the cluster learning rule successfully reproduced plausible orientation preference maps similar to experimental observations [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Here the cluster learning rule means that a synaptic connection between a presynaptic and a postsynaptic neuron is strengthened by the simultaneous activation of the presynaptic neuron and of neurons located near the postsynaptic neuron. A Self-Consistent Monte Carlo (SCMC) method with the use of both an inhibitory neuron pool and the cluster learning rule successfully reproduced plausible orientation preference maps similar to experimental observations [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In 'a cluster learning rule', a synaptic connection s ik is strengthened by simultaneous activation of an input neuron k and a cluster of output neurons j which are located close to the output neuron i. The cluster learning rule is incorporated into learning equations as follows [14][15][16]:…”
Section: Cluster Learning Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though the information provided by optical imaging is significant, there seems to be no established theory explaining the geometric organization of orientation domains. Many theoretical studies have focused on self-organization of the orientation map (Linsker 1986;Tanaka 1990;Miller 1994;Obermayer et al 1992;Kuroiwa et al 2000), but few have focused on the geometric structure of the map. Here we consider geometrical characteristics of the orientation map before we go into the details of our model.…”
Section: Geometric Orientation Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%