2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Organization of Spatio-Temporal Hierarchy via Learning of Dynamic Visual Image Patterns on Action Sequences

Abstract: It is well known that the visual cortex efficiently processes high-dimensional spatial information by using a hierarchical structure. Recently, computational models that were inspired by the spatial hierarchy of the visual cortex have shown remarkable performance in image recognition. Up to now, however, most biological and computational modeling studies have mainly focused on the spatial domain and do not discuss temporal domain processing of the visual cortex. Several studies on the visual cortex and other b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such deep architectures are presently among the best performing solutions for action classification from real videos in computer vision. Also, recently, deep architectures including dynamical neurons that learn hierarchical spatio-temporal representations have been proposed (Jung et al, 2015). Many details of the existing deep architectures (applied filter kernels, training schemes, regularization by ''drop out,'' etc.)…”
Section: Example-based Visual Recognition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such deep architectures are presently among the best performing solutions for action classification from real videos in computer vision. Also, recently, deep architectures including dynamical neurons that learn hierarchical spatio-temporal representations have been proposed (Jung et al, 2015). Many details of the existing deep architectures (applied filter kernels, training schemes, regularization by ''drop out,'' etc.)…”
Section: Example-based Visual Recognition Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows that the states developed by the system can be suitably mapped onto lower level visual modalities. Thus, further developed models may hierarchically process lower level visual information similar to Jung et al (2015), however, based on top-down predicted, higher level, and bodily grounded motion estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, computational models, such as HAMMER (Demiris and Hayes, 2002;Demiris and Khadhouri, 2006;Demiris et al, 2014), MOSAIC (Wolpert and Kawato, 1998;Haruno et al, 2003), MTRNN (Yamashita and Tani, 2008), and MSTNN (Jung et al, 2015), have received significant attention. These models all rely on prediction and to some extent a pairing of forward and inverse models, and some have been used for internal simulation.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two computational models that have been used in more complex settings are HAMMER (Demiris and Simmons, 2006;Demiris et al, 2014) and the recurrent neural network models by Tani and colleagues Yamashita and Tani, 2008;Jung et al, 2015).…”
Section: Computational Models Of Internal Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%