1991
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.43.625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-organized criticality in a crack-propagation model of earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

9
163
1
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
163
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for many real systems specific equations describing the detailed evolutions of the systems are not known, and, in addition, the information on which the forecast must be based is typically incomplete. The basic prediction problem is, therefore, an inverse problem in the sense that one wants to use some information such as the time 3 series of events to infer something about the likely configuration of the system which is, in most practical situations, completely inaccessible to measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for many real systems specific equations describing the detailed evolutions of the systems are not known, and, in addition, the information on which the forecast must be based is typically incomplete. The basic prediction problem is, therefore, an inverse problem in the sense that one wants to use some information such as the time 3 series of events to infer something about the likely configuration of the system which is, in most practical situations, completely inaccessible to measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, self-organizing systems, whether critical or not, typically exhibit scaling over some range of sizes and are thought to evolve so that fluctuations in space and time are intrinsically coupled by an underlying threshold dynamics. There has recently been a considerable effort to use self-organizing systems as simple dynamical models of seismic phenomena, 1,2,3,4 in part due to the clear connection between earthquakes and threshold dynamics. Particular attention has been paid to the robust power-law scaling relation-the Gutenberg-Richter law 5 -relating the frequency of earthquakes to their size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of SOC was first introduced in terms of simple cellular automaton models that could reproduce a 1͞f power spectrum [1]. Indeed the power-law characteristic of SOC has been found in the noisy behavior of some transport processes over vastly different time scales as, for instance, the Barkhausen noise of ferromagnets [2], or the distribution of earthquakes' magnitudes [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two main microscopic approaches are discrete dislocation dynamics, accounting for dislocation interactions on different slip planes [8][9][10], and a pinning-depinning model dealing with plasticity on a single slip plane [11,12]. Different meso-scopic continuum models implying partial averaging have also been shown to generate power law statistics of avalanches with realistic exponents [4,13]. Since scale free dislocation activity is expected to be independent of either microscopic or macroscopic details, one can try to maximally simplify the underlying physics while still capturing the observed exponents and even characteristic shape functions [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%