2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2004.06.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-organized growth of Ag islands on Si(1 1 1)-(7 × 7)-optimization of an STM experiment by means of KMC simulations

Abstract: A growth model and parameters obtained in our previous experimental (STM) and theoretical (Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations) studies of Ag/ Si(111)-(7×7) heteroepitaxy were used to optimise growth conditions (temperature and deposition rate) for the most ordered self-organized growth of Ag island arrays on the (7×7) reconstructed surface. The conditions were estimated by means of KMC simulations using the preference in occupation of half unit cells (HUCs) of F-type as a criterion of island ordering. Morphology … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After deposition for 180 s (or at a nominal coverage of three monolayers), this model indicates that the surface was covered by a network of Ag islands with a preferential height of five monolayers, which just exceeded the percolation threshold. The result from our model is consistent with the available STM, optical and photoelectron diffraction (PED) measurements [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…After deposition for 180 s (or at a nominal coverage of three monolayers), this model indicates that the surface was covered by a network of Ag islands with a preferential height of five monolayers, which just exceeded the percolation threshold. The result from our model is consistent with the available STM, optical and photoelectron diffraction (PED) measurements [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To optimize the growth of arrays of well-defined clusters we have varied the deposition rate, the substrate temperature during evaporation, the total Ag coverage and the annealing temperature. Based on the work of Kocán et al [21] and preliminary measurements, we have established that the deposition rate should be minimized to increase preference for FHUC and overall order. The deposition rate was 4 • 10 −5 1ML • s −1 (ML here corresponds to 6.7 atoms/nm 2 = 6.7 • 10 14 atoms/cm 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simulation consists of growth in 450K and a subsequent annealing process at room temperature for an hour. By fixing [14] and changing E F , E U , E a , randomly, we found a least square between simulation and experimental data points. The simulated P F as a function of deposition rate is shown in Fig.…”
Section: I) the Dispersions Dmentioning
confidence: 98%