2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-praise on Chinese social networking sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The qualitative approach has been chosen in data classification into different types of speech acts. As in ( Ren and Guo, 2020 ; Guo and Ren, 2020 ), the quantitative approach has been applied for calculating the percentages and frequencies of speech acts that define the communicative functions of Facebook (hereafter FB) status updates. Data from this study were elicited mainly via Facebook's status updates, as they provided wide sources of naturalistic behavioural data ( Ellison et al, 2007 ; Wilson et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The qualitative approach has been chosen in data classification into different types of speech acts. As in ( Ren and Guo, 2020 ; Guo and Ren, 2020 ), the quantitative approach has been applied for calculating the percentages and frequencies of speech acts that define the communicative functions of Facebook (hereafter FB) status updates. Data from this study were elicited mainly via Facebook's status updates, as they provided wide sources of naturalistic behavioural data ( Ellison et al, 2007 ; Wilson et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The status updates were categorized and then coded carefully by the researchers. Following Ren & Guo's suggestions ( Ren and Guo, 2020 ), all posts were divided into component messages because a single status update could contain multiple sentences, and a single sentence could comprise multiple functions. To ensure reliability, the data were double-checked by three interraters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common mitigation strategies include speaker's attempts to deny compliments, shifting focus to persons closely related to them, reframing bragging as praise from a third party, admitting the bragging act through disclaimers (e.g. using #brag) or expressing it as a complaint (Wittels, 2011;Sezer et al, 2018), question, narration or sharing (Dayter, 2018;Matley, 2018;Ren and Guo, 2020). The success of self-presentation strategies are also impacted by the social context (Tice et al, 1995) or speaker identity (Paramita and Septianto, 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also amplified by social media platforms through the presence of likes or positive reactions to users' posts (Reinecke and Trepte, 2014) which often are used to quantify impact on the platform (Lampos et al, 2014). Bragging in particular was found to be more frequent on social media than face-to-face interactions (Ren and Guo, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation