2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-preservation of methane hydrate revealed immediately below the eutectic temperature of the mother electrolyte solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The self-preservation concept was also found in electrolyte systems. At 1 atm, the phenomenon was observed at temperature region below the eutectic point of the system and dissociation rates increased greatly once the eutectic temperature was exceeded [90]. This phenomenon could potentially hinder thermal stimulation or depressurization recovery method if inappropriate conditions are applied.…”
Section: Self-preservation Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The self-preservation concept was also found in electrolyte systems. At 1 atm, the phenomenon was observed at temperature region below the eutectic point of the system and dissociation rates increased greatly once the eutectic temperature was exceeded [90]. This phenomenon could potentially hinder thermal stimulation or depressurization recovery method if inappropriate conditions are applied.…”
Section: Self-preservation Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sato et al . 24,25 , have examined the decomposition rates of methane hydrate in the presence of dilute electrolyte solutions (≤34 mol/m 3 ), in the temperature range 233 to 273 K, and reported that the decomposition is remarkably suppressed (slower than hydrates with pure water) immediately below the eutectic temperature. Authors have also observed a brief upsurge in the decomposition rate at the eutectic temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several factors that control the rate of hydrate dissociation, such as experimental temperature (Stern et al, 2001(Stern et al, , 2003 and pressure (Komai et al, 2004). Further, composition of the feed gas (Stern et al, 2003;Takeya and Ripmeester, 2010;Uchida et al, 2011), hydrate granular size (Takeya et al, 2005;Mimachi et al, 2014) and co-existence of certain additives or electrolytes (Zhang and Rogers, 2008;Takeya et al, 2012;Sato et al, 2013), and presence of fine glass beads (Hachikubo et al, 2011) in hydrate forming systems also influence the dissociation process. The effect of temperature on the dissociation process is exhaustively studied in the past by Stern et al (2001) and they reported significantly slower at atmospheric pressure in a temperature window 241e271 K (generally known as self-preservation window), with two minima at 249 and 269 K. Nakoryakov and Misyura (2013) have reported that the thermal dissociation rate is significantly lower in natural hydrates compare to synthetic analogues in self preservation window despite of structural similarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%