2021
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Processing and Self-Face Reaction Time Latencies: A Review

Abstract: In this article, we detail the advantages of self-face identification latencies over more traditional tests of mirror self-recognition. Using reaction time latencies (measured in milliseconds) to identify different dimensions of the self, instead of relying on a simple dichotomous pass/fail mirror mark-test outcome, enables investigators to examine individual differences in self-processing time. This is a significant methodological step forward with important implications. The point of departure for our articl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the high social relevance of faces and names, and the high self-relevance of one's own face and name, the detection of one's own face or name among those of others is the most widely used measure of self-processing. For example, the processing of one's own face ( Bortolon & Raffard, 2018 ; Gallup & Platek, 2021 ) and own name ( Yang et al., 2013 ) has known reaction time advantages over those of familiar and unfamiliar others. In addition, fMRI studies show that seeing one's own face ( Platek et al., 2008 ; Sugiura, 2015 ) as well as seeing or hearing one's own name ( Carmody & Lewis, 2006 ; Tacikowski et al., 2013 ) result in distinct patterns of brain activation in comparison to other faces and names.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high social relevance of faces and names, and the high self-relevance of one's own face and name, the detection of one's own face or name among those of others is the most widely used measure of self-processing. For example, the processing of one's own face ( Bortolon & Raffard, 2018 ; Gallup & Platek, 2021 ) and own name ( Yang et al., 2013 ) has known reaction time advantages over those of familiar and unfamiliar others. In addition, fMRI studies show that seeing one's own face ( Platek et al., 2008 ; Sugiura, 2015 ) as well as seeing or hearing one's own name ( Carmody & Lewis, 2006 ; Tacikowski et al., 2013 ) result in distinct patterns of brain activation in comparison to other faces and names.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%