PsycTESTS Dataset 2006
DOI: 10.1037/t01746-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Rated Emotional Intelligence Scale—Revised

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the WLEIS is a self-report instrument. Although the scale has been shown to be both reliable and valid, it is recommended to use both self-reports and performance tests to measure EI (Brackett et al, 2006). Third, the sample included only university students in China, so the results cannot be generalized.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the WLEIS is a self-report instrument. Although the scale has been shown to be both reliable and valid, it is recommended to use both self-reports and performance tests to measure EI (Brackett et al, 2006). Third, the sample included only university students in China, so the results cannot be generalized.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SREIS. A revised 19-item measure of the SREIS was used (Brackett, 2004; see Appendix). The revised scale corrected for ambiguous statements contained in the original SREIS.…”
Section: Measures Of Eimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Brackett and Mayer (2003) found that SSEIT was weakly correlated with MSCEIT and highly correlated with EQ-I. Similarly, Brackett et al (2006) obtained low correlations among scores of MSCEIT and SREIS. Finally, Kirk et al (2008) found an acceptable correlation between ESES and MSCEIT, but ESES scores were highly correlated with SSEIT scores (Schutte et al, 1998).…”
Section: The Validity Issue Of Ei Competing Measuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Most of all, the problem with EI assessment tools concerns the convergent/divergent validity, since individuals' scores in performance and self-report measures are often poorly or not at all related to each other (Brackett and Mayer, 2003;O'Connor and Little, 2003;Warwick and Nettelbeck, 2004;Bastian et al, 2005;Brackett et al, 2006).…”
Section: The Validity Issue Of Ei Competing Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation