Self-rated health and health-related quality of life are related with adolescents' healthy lifestyle

Marques, Adilson; Santos, Teresa; Martins, João; Matos, Maria Margarida Nunes Gaspar de

doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2019.02.022

Cited by 68 publications

(76 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study on the association strengths of lifestyle behaviors and living environmental factors with SHS. The findings concluded in this study were generally in line with previous studies on the relationship between lifestyle and PS [24,25]. Innovative findings in this study were the significant associations between living environmental factors and MS, living environmental factors and SS.…”

Section: Participant Demographic Characteristicssupporting

confidence: 91%

Associations of living environment and lifestyle factors with sub-health status: A population-based cross-sectional study in urban China

Feng

Xue

Liu

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Sub-health status (SHS) is an increasingly concerned issue with a high prevalence worldwide. Although some factors of lifestyle and environment has been study, few studies have determined comprehensively the associations of lifestyle and living environmental factors with general, physical, mental and social SHS. Methods A cross-sectional face-to-face survey (Sep 2017 to Sep 2018) was conducted via questionnaire among 6,750 urban residents aged 14 years and above randomly selected from five Chinese cities. There were 5,881 valid questionnaires with a response rate of 87%. General linear model and structure equation model were developed to quantifying the effects of lifestyle behaviors and living environmental factors on SHS. Results Detection rates of general SHS, physical SHS, mental SHS and social SHS were 66.7%, 67.0%, 65.5% and 70.0%, respectively. Significant association of general SHS, physical SHS, mental SHS and social SHS had been found in smoking, bad dietary habits, breakfast consumption, physical exercise, sleep duration, air, neighbor harmony and living convenience, instead of noiseless. However, associations of general SHS, physical SHS, mental SHS and social SHS were different for second-hand smoking influence, alcohol consumption, sunshine, Bedtime before 11 pm, surfing the internet, greenery, air, pleasant housing, spacious rooms and fitness facility. Good lifestyle behaviors and favorable living environment factors positively affected SHS (P < 0.001). Lifestyle behaviors had the largest effect on physical SHS (β=-0.418), but the least on social SHS (β=-0.274). Living environmental factors had the largest effect on mental SHS (β = 0.286), but the least on physical SHS (β = 0.225). Conclusions Lifestyle behaviors and living environmental factors were important influencing factors of SHS. Physical SHS was more associated with lifestyle. Lifestyle and living environment were similarly associated with mental and social SHS.

show abstract

Section: Participant Demographic Characteristicssupporting

confidence: 91%

Associations of living environment and lifestyle factors with sub-health status: A population-based cross-sectional study in urban China

Feng

Xue

Liu

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The detailed results are presented in the Additional files, including the assessments of PA, SB and SRH, statistical methods and confounders adjusted for in the regression, and the key results (see Additional file 3 ). The review included 59 cross-sectional studies and nine longitudinal studies [ 1 – 4 , 25 – 28 , 35 – 94 ]. Most of the studies ( n = 43) were conducted in European countries (e.g., UK, Spain, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Portugal, Hungary) or used data from multiple countries.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Associations between physical activity, sedentary behaviour and self-rated health among the general population of children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhang

2020

BMC Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Self-rated health (SRH) is an indicator that captures a person’s perception of their overall health status. The relationship between physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and SRH has been investigated in systematic reviews among adult and elderly populations. No systematic review to date has synthesized the relationship between PA, SB and SRH among children and adolescents. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the associations between PA, SB and SRH in the general population of children and adolescents and to investigate the dose-response relationship between PA, SB and SRH. Methods We conducted a computer search for English language studies in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PSYCINFO that were published between 1946 and 2019. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and the references of the identified publications for additional studies. A meta-analysis was employed to synthesize the associations between PA, SB respectively and SRH. The dose-response association was tested using a random effects meta-regression model. The review was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results Sixty-eight published articles were included in the final review, including 59 cross-sectional and nine longitudinal studies. We found evidence that PA was associated with better SRH, and SB was associated with lower SRH among children and adolescents. A dose-response relationship between PA and SRH was observed, where a higher level of PA was associated with better SRH than a lower level of PA. The relationship between PA, SB and SRH was observed in both boys and girls, and did not show a significant gender difference. Conclusions The findings in the systematic review suggest that health intervention programmes targeting promoting PA and reducing SB among children and adolescents may enhance their overall health status. Future research is needed to expand prospective cohort and intervention studies to address directionality and causality in the relationships between PA, SB and SRH among children and youth. Trial registration PROSPERO - CRD42019142244 . Registered on October 18, 2019.

show abstract

“…LS is an assessment of overall well-being and SRH indicates the adolescents' perception of their health and applies as an index for their physiological conditions (3,19). The relationship of LS and SRH was reported in previous researches (20)(21)(22). Studies showed that individuals with a healthy lifestyle have better SRH and higher LS (23).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Determinants of life satisfaction and self-rated health in Iranian children and adolescents: A structure equation model

Mahmoodi

Ejtahed

Heshmat

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Life satisfaction (LS) and self-rated health (SRH) are related with health outcomes. It is expected that these items are also related to healthy behaviors. Therefore, this study was conducted in order to find out the main determinants of LS and SRH in nationwide representative sample of Iranian children and adolescents.Methods: This study was performed on 13834 students aged 7-18 years who were selected by multistage, stratified cluster sampling method from 30 provinces of Iran. LS and SRH were assessed through a questionnaire based on World Health Organization-Global School-based Student Health Survey protocols. Path analysis was applied to evaluate the relationships among the study variables using the structural modeling. Results: LS was directly affected by age (-0.037 in boys & -0.028 in girls); sedentary time (0.055 in boys & 0.048 in girls); school satisfaction (0.249 in boys & 0.250 in girls); and well-being (0.186 in boys & 0.176 in girls). SRH was directly affected by LS (0.28 in boys & girls) and school satisfaction (0.21 in boys & 0.22 in girls); and indirectly affected by age (-0.046 in boys & -0.017 in girls); sedentary time (-1.99 in boys & -0.145 in girls); family size (-0.005 in boys & -0.014 in girls); and socio-economic status (0.015 in boys & 0.058 in girls). Conclusions: This study indicated that school satisfaction had the greatest positive direct effect on both LS and SRH.

show abstract

Self-rated health and health-related quality of life are related with adolescents' healthy lifestyle

Cited by 68 publications

References 30 publications

Associations of living environment and lifestyle factors with sub-health status: A population-based cross-sectional study in urban China

Associations of living environment and lifestyle factors with sub-health status: A population-based cross-sectional study in urban China

Associations between physical activity, sedentary behaviour and self-rated health among the general population of children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Determinants of life satisfaction and self-rated health in Iranian children and adolescents: A structure equation model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About