Self-Rating of the Effects of Alcohol (SRE): Predictive utility and reliability across interview and self-report administrations

Ray, Lara A.; Hart, Eliza; Chin, Pauline F.

doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.10.009

Cited by 23 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Questions nine and 10 are scored zero, two or four. The maximum score of AUDIT is 40 and a score equal or greater than 8 means high risk for alcoholism (10). This questionnaire was not applied in day of trauma because alcoholic conditions could have interfered in answering it.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alcohol abusive use increases facial trauma?

Soares-Carneiro¹,

Vasconcelos²,

da-Silva³

et al. 2016

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundTrauma is among the main death causes and morbidity in the world and is often related to the use of alcohol and its abuse has reached massive proportions, no matter if the country is developed or not, being considered as public health problem. Since there are very few randomized and prospective studies in literature about the association of facial trauma and the use of alcohol, this study aims to investigate the impact of alcohol use in facial trauma.Material and MethodsThis was a prospective and cross sectional study, involving facial trauma patients attended at Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Division of a State Hospital. Variables included patient´s profile, trauma etiology, facial region involved, type of injury and treatment and days of hospitalization. AUDIT test was applied to identify risks and damages of alcohol use and chemical dependence. Absolute distribution, uni and mutilvaried percentages were made for data evaluation. Pearson´s qui-squared and Fisher´s Exact tests were also used.ResultsOne hundred patients were evaluated. The patient´s mean age was 33.50 years-old, 48% had between 17 and 29 years old, 28% had 30 to 39, and 24% 40 or more. Most of them were male (86%). The most frequent etiology was traffic accident (57%), the extraoral area was most committed (62%), the most frequent type of injury was fractures (78%) and the most affected bone was the mandible (36%). More than half of the patients (53%) had surgical treatment. 38% had their discharge from hospital right after the first attendance. The AUDIT most frequent answer was “moderate use” (46%) and use at risk (39%). There was significant difference between the use of alcohol (AUDIT) and hematoma (0.003) and number of days of hospitalization (p=0.005).ConclusionsIn this study it was not observed association between alcohol consumption using the AUDIT and trauma etiology, but patient victims of traffic accidents were classified as with risk in the scale. Most of the trauma were caused by traffic accidents using motorcycles and occurred in young aged men. Key words:Wounds and injuries, traumatology and alcohol-induced disorders.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alcohol abusive use increases facial trauma?

Soares-Carneiro¹,

Vasconcelos²,

da-Silva³

et al. 2016

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Two scores were generated, one for the approximate fi rst fi ve times of drinking (the SRE5) and the other the number of drinks for effects averaged across the fi rst fi ve times, the period of heaviest drinking, and the most recent 3 months (the SRET) (Ray et al, 2011;Schuckit et al, 1997b). This instrument, with a Cronbach's α > .90 and 12-month to 5-year reliabilities between .6 and .8, recorded the number of standard drinks required for fi rst feeling effects, slurring speech, impairing coordination, and passing out.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationships Among Independent Major Depressions, Alcohol Use, and Other Substance Use and Related Problems Over 30 Years in 397 Families

Schuckit¹,

Smith²,

Kalmijn³

2013

J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Objective: Although heavy drinking is related to sadness on multiple levels, the link between alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and major depressive episodes (MDEs) is more controversial. One complicating factor is that some MDEs are temporary and only occur in the context of heavy drinking, whereas other MDEs are longer lasting and occur independently of intense alcohol intake (i.e., independent depressive episodes [IDEs]). We hypothesized that a longitudinal study that uses validated interviews with subjects and relatives and distinguishes between IDEs and alcohol-induced depressive episodes would reveal little evidence of a link between IDEs and AUDs. Method: Histories of AUDs, IDEs, and substance-induced depressions were prospectively evaluated over 30 years in 397 male probands from the San Diego Prospective Study and in their 449 offspring using questions extracted from the Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcoholism interview. Results: The rate of IDEs over 30 years in the 397 probands was 15.3% overall. Among probands who developed AUDs, 31% of their depressive episodes were substance induced, not IDEs. For these men followed over 3 decades, those with IDEs had no increased rate of AUDs and evidenced no higher rate of use or abuse/dependence on illicit substances. Similar conclusions applied to their 449 offspring ages 12 years and older. Conclusions: These data support the importance of distinguishing between IDE and substance-induced depressions when evaluating the relationship between AUDs and depression syndromes. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 74, 271-279, 2013)

show abstract

“…The SRE score for any time frame is the sum of the number of drinks reported across the range of effects actually experienced divided by the number of effects reported. This questionnaire has a literature-based Cronbach's α of .97, has retest reliabilities as high as .8, correlates with the alcohol challenge in predicting future heavy drinking at about .60, and performs similarly to the alcohol challenge-based LR when incorporated in SEM analyses (Daeppen et al, 2000;Ray et al, 2011;Schuckit et al, 2009bSchuckit et al, , 2010Schuckit et al, , 2011aTrim et al, 2009).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison Across Two Generations of Prospective Models of How the Low Level of Response to Alcohol Affects Alcohol Outcomes

Schuckit¹,

Smith²,

Kalmijn³

et al. 2012

J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Objective: This article presents the fi rst direct comparison of level of response (LR)-based prospective models in two generations of the same families. To accomplish this, we describe results from the fi rst prospective evaluation of potential mediators of how an earlier low LR to alcohol relates to adverse alcohol outcomes in offspring from the San Diego Prospective Study (SDPS). Method: To compare with data from probands in the SDPS, new data were gathered from 86 drinking offspring (age ~20 years) during the 25-year follow-up of these families. Consistent with the usual effect of a low LR, outcomes 5 years later for both generations focused on drinking quantities as well as alcohol problems during the follow-up. A structural equation model (SEM) was used to analyze the relationships among variables, and the models in proband and offspring generations were compared using direct observations of the model results and through invariance procedures. Results: In these drinking offspring, LR correlated with 5-year outcomes (r = .48, p < .001) and the SEM R 2 was .48, with good fi t statistics. As predicted, the LR relationship to alcohol-related outcomes was both direct and partially mediated by heavier peer drinking, positive alcohol expectancies, and using alcohol to cope with stress. These results were similar to a previously published prospective model in SDPS probands, although path coeffi cients were generally higher in the younger group. Conclusions: The LR-based model of heavier drinking operated similarly across generations, with some modest differences. These results indicate that the model may be meaningful in both younger and middle-age groups. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 73, 195-204, 2012)

show abstract

Self-Rating of the Effects of Alcohol (SRE): Predictive utility and reliability across interview and self-report administrations

Cited by 23 publications

References 24 publications

Alcohol abusive use increases facial trauma?

Alcohol abusive use increases facial trauma?

Relationships Among Independent Major Depressions, Alcohol Use, and Other Substance Use and Related Problems Over 30 Years in 397 Families

Comparison Across Two Generations of Prospective Models of How the Low Level of Response to Alcohol Affects Alcohol Outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About