1993
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.12.5394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-recognition in helicate self-assembly: spontaneous formation of helical metal complexes from mixtures of ligands and metal ions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
292
0
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 533 publications
(308 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
9
292
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Even intrinsically weak interactions such as these can have a major effect on the product distribution of the cyclic-helicate-forming reaction (in this case, one handedness of helix being significantly thermodynamically favoured over the other), because ten such interactions are present per pentameric helicate complex. However, the driving force for helix formation is not sufficiently strong to bring about 'self-sorting' [41][42][43] : racemic 2g forms a mixture of oligomers and polymers rather than the two (M)-and (P)-[3g]Cl(PF 6 ) 9 cyclic helicates (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even intrinsically weak interactions such as these can have a major effect on the product distribution of the cyclic-helicate-forming reaction (in this case, one handedness of helix being significantly thermodynamically favoured over the other), because ten such interactions are present per pentameric helicate complex. However, the driving force for helix formation is not sufficiently strong to bring about 'self-sorting' [41][42][43] : racemic 2g forms a mixture of oligomers and polymers rather than the two (M)-and (P)-[3g]Cl(PF 6 ) 9 cyclic helicates (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] In conclusion, the reaction of 1 and 2 with n-hexylamine (3) leads to a perfectly self-sorted and dynamic mixture of open circular helicates of different sizes, 4 and 5. Although this involves formation of imine bonds, it is effectively a cyclic version of the self-sorting experiment with linear helicates pioneered by Lehn and co-workers, [5] but instead of using ligand strands that sort according to the number of bidentate binding sites and overall length, 1 and 2 have the same number of binding sites and differ only by a one atom spacing of those binding sites within the strand. [14,15] Nonetheless, each ligand is able to effectively distinguish self from non-self in forming different-sized circular assemblies and the components are able to exchange in-and-out of the circular helicates in a facile manner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] The use of orthogonal recognition elements is a convenient way to achieve sorting in artificial systems, [1,3] but other methods, [4] including subtle differences in ligand design, [5][6][7] can also be remarkably effective. A beautiful example is the classic experiment by Lehn and co-workers [5] in which a mixture of ligand strands containing two to five 2,2'-bipyridine groups spontaneously self-sort into linear double helicates, each containing two ligands with equal numbers of binding sites, in the presence of Cu I ions.We recently described the synthesis of a molecular Solomon link [8] (a doubly entwined [2]catenane [9] ) and a molecular pentafoil knot, [10] each formed through a combination of metal-ligand coordination, an anion template, and geometric restrictions. These closely related structures are derived from tetra- [8] and pentameric [10] circular helicate scaffolds, respectively, and are assembled from up to 20 common, or similar, components.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is illustrated, for instance, in the self-selection of ligand strands in helicates (8) and building blocks in supramolecular cages, capsules (9-11), and polymers (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%