Self‐regulation of ventromedial prefrontal cortex activation using real‐time fMRI neurofeedback—Influence of default mode network

Abstract

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is involved in regulation of negative emotion and decision-making, emotional and behavioral control, and active resilient coping. This pilot study examined the feasibility of training healthy subjects (n = 27) to self-regulate the vmPFC activity using a real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRI-nf). Participants in the experimental group (EG, n = 18) were provided with an ongoing vmPFC hemodynamic activity (rtfMRI-nf signal represented as variable-height bar). Individuals were instructed to raise the bar by self-relevant value-based thinking. Participants in the control group (CG, n = 9) performed the same task; however, they were provided with computer-generated sham neurofeedback signal. Results demonstrate that (a) both the CG and the EG show a higher vmPFC fMRI signal at the baseline than during neurofeedback training; (b) no significant positive training effect was seen in the vmPFC across neurofeedback runs; however, the medial prefrontal cortex, middle temporal gyri, inferior frontal gyri, and precuneus showed significant decreasing trends across the training runs only for the EG; (c) the vmPFC rtfMRI-nf signal associated with the fMRI signal across the default mode network (DMN). These findings suggest that it may be difficult to modulate a single DMN region without affecting other DMN regions. Observed decreased vmPFC activity during the neurofeedback task could be due to interference from the fMRI signal within other DMN network regions, as well as interaction with taskpositive networks. Even though participants in the EG did not show significant positive increase in the vmPFC activity among neurofeedback runs, they were able to learn to accommodate the demand of self-regulation task to maintain the vmPFC activity with the help of a neurofeedback signal.K E Y W O R D S brain, default mode network, emotion, fMRI Neurofeedback, functional connectivity, selfregulation, vmPFC

A functional MRI study of presurgical cognitive deficits in glioma patients

“…For example, it could be used to monitor effects of neurofeedback training. 35 From a surgical perspective, sparing this network could be important in preventing further loss of cognitive functions. At least, our findings imply that solely examining increases in brain activity in fMRI is likely insufficient to characterize the neuroanatomy of cognitive functions in glioma patients.…”

Common default mode network dysfunction across psychopathologies: A neuroimaging meta-analysis of the n-back working memory paradigm

“…As this meta-analysis captures cross-sectional data, further studies are necessary to determine whether the observed differences in brain activity are a cause or consequence of subjects’ respective diagnoses. Finally, recent research has used the mPFC as a target for fMRI-based neurofeedback (48). Future studies should determine whether this approach is capable of mitigating working memory deficits in individuals with psychopathology.…”

Differential Effects of Up- and Down-Regulation of SMR Coherence on EEG Activity and Memory Performance: A Neurofeedback Training Study

“…However, although specific EEG oscillations recorded over specific brain regions are trained in prior NF studies, concomitant changes in other EEG oscillations and other brain regions are reported as well (Gruzelier, 2014a,b;Kober et al, 2015bKober et al, , 2017bReichert et al, 2016;Ros et al, 2019). This indicates that it is not possible to modulate only one EEG frequency over a specific EEG electrode without modulating also the activity in the networks the trained brain regions are connected with (Ninaus et al, 2013(Ninaus et al, , 2015Wood et al, 2014;Emmert et al, 2016;Davelaar, 2018;Mayeli et al, 2019).…”