2003
DOI: 10.1300/j001v21n01_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Report in Supervision

Abstract: Supervisors in academic clinical training settings may espouse various approaches to the transfer of information between therapist-trainee and supervisor, depending partly on orientation to psychotherapy and research. Self-report, in which the trainee narrates what occurred in the therapy session, may carry the risk of conscious or unconscious distortion of therapy material but may also offer certain advantages. These pros and cons are discussed, through personal experience, case material, and review of the li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supervisee self-report is the most frequently used source of data on supervisee performance and client/patient progress (e.g., Goodyear & Nelson, 1997;Noelle, 2003;Scott, Pachana, & Sofronoff, 2011). The accuracy of those re ports, however, is constrained by human memory and in formation processing as well as by supervisees' self-pro tective distortion and biases, (Haggerty & Hilsenroth, 2011;Ladany, Hill, Corbett, & Nutt, 1996;Pope, Sonne, & Green, 2006;Yourman & Farber, 1996) that result in their not disclosing errors, resulting in the loss of potentially important clinical data.…”
Section: G U Id E Lin E 2 : a M A Jo R S U P E Rv Is O Ry Re S P O N mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervisee self-report is the most frequently used source of data on supervisee performance and client/patient progress (e.g., Goodyear & Nelson, 1997;Noelle, 2003;Scott, Pachana, & Sofronoff, 2011). The accuracy of those re ports, however, is constrained by human memory and in formation processing as well as by supervisees' self-pro tective distortion and biases, (Haggerty & Hilsenroth, 2011;Ladany, Hill, Corbett, & Nutt, 1996;Pope, Sonne, & Green, 2006;Yourman & Farber, 1996) that result in their not disclosing errors, resulting in the loss of potentially important clinical data.…”
Section: G U Id E Lin E 2 : a M A Jo R S U P E Rv Is O Ry Re S P O N mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that the supervision experts judged 35 of the 37 supervision descriptors as undeniably inadequate supervision. Second, an essential component of effective supervision is observing the supervisee's in-session work (e.g., Bernard & Goodyear, 2014;Huhra, Yamokoski-Maynhart, & Prieto, 2008;Noelle, 2002)-failure to do so is also a legal liability concern. We included these two supervision descriptors for mainly two reasons.…”
Section: Reconceptualizing the Framework And Selecting De Facto Supermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the current literature and guidelines lack clear explication of adequate and inadequate supervision, the construct definition and taxonomy delineated here are open to debate. Nevertheless, we included this criterion in the definition of minimally adequate supervision, the taxonomy of DFIS descriptors, and construct definition for inadequate supervision because many believe that it is vital for the supervisee's competence and professional development (e.g., AAMFT, 2003AAMFT, , 2007Bernard & Goodyear, 2014;Falender & Shafranske, 2004;Huhra et al, 2008;Noelle, 2002). Nevertheless, we included this criterion in the definition of minimally adequate supervision, the taxonomy of DFIS descriptors, and construct definition for inadequate supervision because many believe that it is vital for the supervisee's competence and professional development (e.g., AAMFT, 2003AAMFT, , 2007Bernard & Goodyear, 2014;Falender & Shafranske, 2004;Huhra et al, 2008;Noelle, 2002).…”
Section: Practical Implications and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To inform this learning process and meet service user needs, supervisors and providers have relied on provider self-report and progress notes (Accurso et al, 2011). The discussion of provider self-report and progress notes have potential strengths for understanding the clinical encounter, but also introduce potential obfuscation of key information given the nature of the supervisory relationship (Noelle, 2003). Opportunities for external practice review and feedback may provide insights into areas for improvement and share the substantial responsibility for practice quality with others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%