2014
DOI: 10.1177/2325957414557263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Report Measures in the Assessment of Antiretroviral Medication Adherence

Abstract: These data suggest various SRA measures hold clinical value in screening for poor ART adherence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences may suggest sensitivity of self-report adherence measures to bias, including over reporting or problem recalling real adherence levels. However, consistent with prior studies (Kabore et al, 2015; Simoni et al, 2014), there was no evidence of significant differences or overestimation between the two adherence measures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences may suggest sensitivity of self-report adherence measures to bias, including over reporting or problem recalling real adherence levels. However, consistent with prior studies (Kabore et al, 2015; Simoni et al, 2014), there was no evidence of significant differences or overestimation between the two adherence measures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Respondents were asked to place an “X” inside the box above the point showing the best guess about how much of their current antiretroviral (ARV) medications were taken in the past 30 days. Despite their limitations, patient self-assessments of ART adherence have been shown to perform well (i.e., no evidence of significant overestimation) in comparison with other more objective adherence measures such as pharmacy records (Kabore et al, 2015; Ross-Degnan et al, 2010; Simoni et al, 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants may overestimate their adherence to ART because of social desirability bias. However, some evidence suggests that self-reported adherence measures are able to detect poor ART adherence (Kabore et al, 2015 ), and by using a conservative rule of 100% adherent, we may have been able to detect a significant proportion of those who were truly non-adherent. However, future work should assess the association between psychosocial syndemic factors and ART adherence among MSM in Latin America using objective measures, such as viral load, in order to confirm these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the association of viral load to both pill count and self-report PCA adherence scores shows that these can be useful indicators of adherence. 31 Second, this analysis mainly examined main effects, and not interactions because of the wide number of potential variables possible for interactions such as study site, HIV risk group, gender, and country. Third, although participants enrolled in the study as a prevention trial, it is possible that some participants’ motivation to join was as a vehicle to gaining ART as treatment for themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%