2009
DOI: 10.1080/00952990802295212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Report of Drinking Compared to Objective Markers of Alcohol Consumption

Abstract: Collateral informants serve an important function in supporting the validity of self-report of abstinence versus relapse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, due to stigmatization and other adverse outcomes, self-report of smoking and drinking in high risk populations is often unreliable (Burgess et al, 2009; Caraballo et al, 2001; Erim et al, 2007; Russell et al, 2004; Whitford et al, 2009). Second, even if studies utilize biochemical verification of substance use status, current biological measures are known to have limited sensitivity (Florescu et al, 2009; Tavakoli et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, due to stigmatization and other adverse outcomes, self-report of smoking and drinking in high risk populations is often unreliable (Burgess et al, 2009; Caraballo et al, 2001; Erim et al, 2007; Russell et al, 2004; Whitford et al, 2009). Second, even if studies utilize biochemical verification of substance use status, current biological measures are known to have limited sensitivity (Florescu et al, 2009; Tavakoli et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although %CDT, a form of the serum iron carrying protein transferrin with altered carbohydrate composition, is a more specific marker for identifying chronic excessive alcohol use and monitoring abstinence, it does not have the desired sensitivity and specificity (Golka, K., et al 2004). Substantial efforts have been made to construct interview formats that correctly identify those with alcohol use disorder, such as AUDIT-C (Hawkins, E. J., et al 2010), CAGE (Skogen, J. C., et al 2011), or reports from collateral family who interact with the subject (Whitford, J. L., et al 2009). Limitations of this approach are most apparent in cases where individuals are motivated to deny or minimize the magnitude of drinking behavior to mitigate personal ramifications (Freeman, W. M. & Vrana, K. E. 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those who enter and complete treatment, approximately 60% will relapse to some drinking within the first year following alcohol treatment (Maisto et al, 2003; Whitford et al, 2009). With these findings in mind, current research on the outcomes of alcohol-use-disorder treatments examines mechanisms of change associated with reduced alcohol use (Longabaugh et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%