Self‐reported cues about deceptive and truthful communication: The effects of cognitive capacity and communicator veracity

Feeley, Thomas Hugh; Young, Melissa J.

doi:10.1080/01463370009385585

“…Several studies explored evaluators' cognitions by manipulating (rather than measuring) cognitive capacity, for instance by creating high versus low cognitive load conditions. Initial examinations of the impact of cognitive load on deception detection led to mixed results (Feeley & Young, 2000;Millar & Millar, 1997). But recent studies have highlighted more encouraging results.…”

Section: Cognitionsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Only high trusters with high cognitions may actually possess (or have developed) a form of social intelligence (Yamagishi, 2001) making them more capable to detect applicant IM. Importantly, this study relies on an actual measure of cognitive ability, whereas existing deception detection studies have mostly manipulated cognitive resources (e.g., Feeley & Young, 2000;Reinhard & Sporer, 2008). This study has important practical implications for organizations, helping them to improve their employee selection process and hiring decisions.…”

Section: Table 2 Multiple Regressions Predicting Im Detection Predicmentioning

confidence: 99%

Individual Differences Predicting Impression Management Detection in Job Interviews

Roulin¹

2016

PAD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…60 Resistance to questioning is the primary barrier to entry in the context of interrogation. The challenge to the interrogator is to manage resistance effectively while systematically working to overcome it.…”

Section: Anticipating Resistance: the Importance Of Being Shrewdmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Examples of relevant research include studies on the impact of interviewer and interviewee personality characteristics, 58,59,60,61,62,63 expectancy effects, 13,64 social biases, [65][66][67] and interviewer and interviewee confi dence, 68,69 to name a few. These studies highlight the very complex nature of this problem and the need for substantially more research on these moderator variables.…”

Section: Moderator Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Educing Information: Interrogation: Science and Art Foundations for the Future

2006

PsycEXTRA Dataset

2

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. REPORT DATE DEC 20062 Same as Report (SAR)18 About the Intelligence Science Board MissionThe Intelligence Science Board was chartered in August 2002 and advises the Offi ce of the Director of National Intelligence and senior Intelligence Community leaders on emerging scientifi c and technical issues of special importance to the Intelligence Community. The mission of the Board is to provide the Intelligence Community with outside expert advice and unconventional thinking, early notice of advances in science and technology, insight into new applications of existing technology, and special studies that require skills or organizational approaches not resident within the Intelligence Community. The Board also creates linkages between the Intelligence Community and the scientifi c and technical communities. ImpactBoard members initiate studies and assessments in topic areas where they believe that the Board's interdisciplinary expertise and experience could benefi t the Intelligence Community. In addition, the Board responds to tasking from the Associate Director of National Intelligence for Science and Technology and from the heads of elements of the Intelligence Community. All ISB tasks are mutually agreed to by the ISB and by the Associate Director of National Intelligence for Science and Technology. The Board's procedures for developing and communicating its fi ndings and advice will remain as fl exible and informal as is possible, consistent with the mission. MembershipThe Board is composed of approximately 25 members whose range of expertise encompasses the physical and biological sciences, information technology and communications, information policy, and the law, among others. The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not refl ect the offi cial policy or position of the Department of Defense, the National Foreign Intelligence Community or the U.S. Government EDUCING INFORMATION Interrogation: Science and Art The National Defense Intelligence College supports and encourages research on intelligence issues that distills lessons and improves Intelligence Community capabilities for policy-level and operational consumersEducing Information: Interrogatio...

show abstract

“…Examples of relevant research include studies on the impact of interviewer and interviewee personality characteristics, 58,59,60,61,62,63 expectancy effects, 13,64 social biases, 65-67 and interviewer and interviewee confi dence, 68,69 to 50 name a few. These studies highlight the very complex nature of this problem and the need for substantially more research on these moderator variables.…”

Section: Moderator Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Educing Information - Interrogation: Science and Art, Foundations for the Future

Fein¹,

Lehner²,

Vossekuil³

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. REPORT DATE DEC 20062 Same as Report (SAR)18 About the Intelligence Science Board MissionThe Intelligence Science Board was chartered in August 2002 and advises the Offi ce of the Director of National Intelligence and senior Intelligence Community leaders on emerging scientifi c and technical issues of special importance to the Intelligence Community. The mission of the Board is to provide the Intelligence Community with outside expert advice and unconventional thinking, early notice of advances in science and technology, insight into new applications of existing technology, and special studies that require skills or organizational approaches not resident within the Intelligence Community. The Board also creates linkages between the Intelligence Community and the scientifi c and technical communities. ImpactBoard members initiate studies and assessments in topic areas where they believe that the Board's interdisciplinary expertise and experience could benefi t the Intelligence Community. In addition, the Board responds to tasking from the Associate Director of National Intelligence for Science and Technology and from the heads of elements of the Intelligence Community. All ISB tasks are mutually agreed to by the ISB and by the Associate Director of National Intelligence for Science and Technology. The Board's procedures for developing and communicating its fi ndings and advice will remain as fl exible and informal as is possible, consistent with the mission. MembershipThe Board is composed of approximately 25 members whose range of expertise encompasses the physical and biological sciences, information technology and communications, information policy, and the law, among others. The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not refl ect the offi cial policy or position of the Department of Defense, the National Foreign Intelligence Community or the U.S. Government EDUCING INFORMATION Interrogation: Science and Art The National Defense Intelligence College supports and encourages research on intelligence issues that distills lessons and improves Intelligence Community capabilities for policy-level and operational consumersEducing Information: Interrogatio...

show abstract

Self‐reported cues about deceptive and truthful communication: The effects of cognitive capacity and communicator veracity

Cited by 35 publications

References 49 publications

Individual Differences Predicting Impression Management Detection in Job Interviews

Individual Differences Predicting Impression Management Detection in Job Interviews

Educing Information: Interrogation: Science and Art Foundations for the Future

Educing Information - Interrogation: Science and Art, Foundations for the Future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About