Self-reported decreases in the purchases of selected unhealthy foods resulting from the implementation of warning labels in Mexican youth and adult population

Abstract

BackgroundFront-of-package nutritional warning labels (WLs) are designed to facilitate identification and selection of healthier food choices. We assessed self-reported changes in purchasing different types of unhealthy foods due to WLs in Mexico and the association between the self-reported reductions in purchases of sugary beverages and intake of water and sugar-sweetened beverages.MethodsData came from 14-17 year old youth (n=1,696) and adults ≥18 (n=7,775) who participated in the Mexican arm of the 2020-2021 International Food Policy Study, an annual repeat cross-sectional online survey. Participants self-reported whether the WLs had influenced them to purchase less of each of ten unhealthy food categories due to WLs. Among adults, a 23-item Beverage Frequency Questionnaire was used derive past 7-day intake of water and sugary beverages analyzed to determine the relationship between self-reported reductions in purchasing sugary drinks due to the WLs. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the percentage of participants who self-reported reducing purchases within each food group, and overall. Sociodemographic characteristics associated with this reduction were investigated as well.ResultsOverall, 44.8% of adults and 38.7% of youth reported buying less of unhealthy food categories due to the implementation of WL, with the largest proportion reporting decreased purchases of cola, regular and diet soda. A greater impact of WLs on the reported purchase of unhealthy foods was observed among the following socio-demographic characteristics: females, individuals who self-identified as indigenous, those who were overweight, individuals with lower educational levels, those with higher nutrition knowledge, households with children, and those with a significant role in household food purchases. In addition, adults who reported higher water intake and lower consumption of sugary beverages were more likely to report reduced purchases of sugary drinks due to the WLs. Adults who reported greater water intake and lower sugary beverages intake were significantly more likely to report buying fewer sugary drinks due to the WLs.ConclusionOur findings suggest that implementation of WLs has reduced purchases of unhealthy foods in Mexico. These results underscore the positive impact of the labeling policy particularly in subpopulations with lower levels of education and among indigenous adults.

Nutri-Score and nutrition warning labels are acceptable and effective in guiding hypothetical choice in Indonesia, Mexico, and Türkiye: Results from a cross-country online experiment

“…This might suggest that participants from Mexico, despite having been exposed to warning labels for two years, have not learned to adjust their food choiceswhich is also supported by the fact that they did not necessarily make healthier choices than participants from the other countries. This would, however, be at odds with initial evaluations of the real-world implementation of warning labels in Mexico, where a substantial number of respondents indicated to have changed their food choice patterns post-implementation (45). Thus, results could also be interpreted in a different manner: First, they might indicate that FOPNL are in fact easily and intuitively understood, and minimal information is required for individuals to be able to make use of the labels (46).…”

Predicted impact of banning nonessential, energy-dense food and beverages in schools in Mexico: A microsimulation study

“…In all 3 cases, weight reduction is simulated for 1 year, although the nonlinear equation used in all studies suggests that further impacts on body weight after the first year of simulation are to be expected [40]. Empirical evidence from an online survey in adolescents aged 13 to 17 years in Mexico showed a reduction of 38.7% in the purchase of NEDFBs after the implementation of the front-of-package labeling [41]. However, the relative reduction does not allow us to quantify the reduction in kcal to properly compare the results with our study.…”

Promoting healthy populations as a pandemic preparedness strategy: a simulation study from Mexico

“… 14 A survey found that 44.8% of adults reported buying less unhealthy food because of front-of pack labelling, although the survey is not nationally representative. 15 Still, it is unknown whether an earlier implementation of these measures could have changed the COVID-19 epidemic impact in Mexico.…”