2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Reported Emotion Reactivity Among Early-Adolescent Girls: Evidence for Convergent and Discriminant Validity in an Urban Community Sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of the validation of the instrument, we investigated the construct validity (comprising convergent and discriminant validity) of the TEC-M, which reflects the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure (17). Convergent validity deals with the association between the test under investigation and a theoretically related variable (18), whereas discriminant validity is supported by the finding of smaller or non-existing associations with scores from instruments that are not directly theoretically related (18), thus supporting the uniqueness of a new measure (19). Several studies have suggested a link between executive functions and ER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the validation of the instrument, we investigated the construct validity (comprising convergent and discriminant validity) of the TEC-M, which reflects the degree to which an instrument measures what it purports to measure (17). Convergent validity deals with the association between the test under investigation and a theoretically related variable (18), whereas discriminant validity is supported by the finding of smaller or non-existing associations with scores from instruments that are not directly theoretically related (18), thus supporting the uniqueness of a new measure (19). Several studies have suggested a link between executive functions and ER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERS (Nock et al, 2008) is a 21‐item questionnaire that assesses emotion reactivity and has demonstrated strong internal consistency and convergent and discriminant validity in participants as young as 11 years (Evans et al, 2016; Nock et al, 2008). At intake, participants reported on how they regularly experience emotions (e.g., “ I experience emotions very strongly ”), with items rated on a 5‐point scale from 0 (not at all like me) to 4 (completely like me).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make a stronger case for our behavioral probe of emotional reactivity, Experiment 3 assessed individual differences using the Emotional Reactivity Scale (ERS: Nock, Wedig, Holmberg, & Hooley, 2008). The ERS has been linked to a broad array of psychopathological symptoms and to suicidal thoughts (Evans et al, 2016), but in the context of a relatively pure focus on tendencies toward emotional reactivity (Nock et al, 2008). If the EVMT effect captures processes related to emotional reactivity, then its size may be amplified at higher levels of the ERS continuum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%