Self-reported Eye Care Use Among US Adults Aged 50 to 80 Years

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Contemporary data on use of eye care by US adults are critical, as the prevalence of age-related eye disease and vision impairment are projected to increase in the coming decades.OBJECTIVES To provide nationally representative estimates on self-reported use of eye care by adults aged 50 to 80 years, and to describe the reasons that adults do and do not seek eye care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThe National Poll on Healthy Aging, a cross-sectional, nationally representative online survey was conducted from March 9 to 24, 2018, among 2013 individuals aged 50 to 80 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe proportion of US adults who received an eye examination within the past 2 years as well as the sociodemographic and economic factors associated with receipt of eye care. RESULTS Among 2013 adults aged 50 to 80 years (survey-weighted proportion of women, 52.5%; white non-Hispanic, 71.1%; mean [SD] age, 62.1 [9.0] years), the proportion reporting that they underwent an eye examination in the past year was 58.5% (95% CI, 56.1%-60.8%) and in the past 2 years was 82.4% (95% CI, 80.4%-84.2%). Among those with diabetes, 72.2% (95% CI, 67.2%-76.8%) reported undergoing an eye examination in the past year and 91.3% (95% CI, 87.7%-93.9%) in the past 2 years. The odds of having undergone an eye examination within the past 2 years were higher among women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.00; 95% CI, 1.50-2.67), respondents with household incomes of $30 000 or more (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.08-2.29), and those with a diagnosed age-related eye disease (AOR, 3.67; 95% CI, 2.37-5.69) or diabetes (AOR, 2.30; 95% CI,). The odds were lower for respondents who were unmarried (AOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.96), from the Midwest (AOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34-0.87) or West (AOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94), or reported fair or poor vision (AOR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.65). Reasons reported for not undergoing a recent eye examination included having no perceived problems with their eyes or vision (41.5%), cost (24.9%), or lack of insurance coverage (23.4%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this study, the rate of eye examinations was generally high among US adults aged 50 to 80 years, yet there were several significant demographic and socioeconomic differences in the use of eye care. These findings may be relevant to health policy efforts to address disparities in eye care and to promote care for those most at risk for vision problems.

Internet and Health Information Technology Use and Psychological Distress Among Older Adults With Self-Reported Vision Impairment: Case-Control Study

“…Those who had visits with an eye doctor may be more socioeconomically advantaged than those who did not. Ehrlich et al [ 29 ] found that unmarried, older adults with a low income were less likely than their more advantaged peers to report a recent eye examination, and common reasons for not having an eye examination included cost and lack of insurance coverage. Thus, the relationship between health care provider contact and internet use may reflect the digital divide because of socioeconomic status.…”

Eye Examination Recency among African American Older Adults with Chronic Medical Conditions

“…The frequency of eye exams in our sample of diabetic African-American individuals aged 55 years and older was mirrored the findings of the National Poll on Healthy Aging. Among 2013 diabetic individuals aged 50 to 80 years, 72.2% reported undergoing an eye examination in the past year and 91.3% in the past two years [47]. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey over a 10-year period, vision impairment related to diabetes increased by 20% in the US population [48].…”

Utilization of Outpatient Eye Care Services in Taiwan: A Nationwide Population Study

“…As the eye undergoes degenerative changes, disorders of lens disorders and glaucoma start to inflict the population [9]. Disorder of lens soared to the second most frequent category in the sixth decade of life and remained significant afterwards.…”