2007
DOI: 10.1097/fpc.0b013e3281c10e52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-reported skin color, genomic ancestry and the distribution of GST polymorphisms

Abstract: Interethnic admixture is a source of cryptic population structure that may lead to spurious genotype-phenotype associations in pharmacogenetic/-genomic studies. Logistic regression modeling of GST polymorphisms shows that admixture must be dealt with as a continuous variable, rather than proportioned in arbitrary subcategories for the convenience of data quantification and analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
61
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods that determine genetic ancestry using patient genotype data reflect differences in allele frequencies significantly more accurately. 4,16,34 Preferably, these methods should be fast and easy to use even on large datasets without the need for Figure 3 Scatter plot of PC1 and PC2 of GATC samples with self-reported geographic origin from Canada. PCA shows that the genetic structure of most of these individuals is similar to Europeans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods that determine genetic ancestry using patient genotype data reflect differences in allele frequencies significantly more accurately. 4,16,34 Preferably, these methods should be fast and easy to use even on large datasets without the need for Figure 3 Scatter plot of PC1 and PC2 of GATC samples with self-reported geographic origin from Canada. PCA shows that the genetic structure of most of these individuals is similar to Europeans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is vital to control for the genetic ancestry of each sample. However, commonly used ethnic labels are often insufficient and inaccurate proxies of genetic ancestry especially in populations with extensive admixture 16 and some individuals do not know or wrongly assume their ethnicity. It is therefore imperative to apply other methods to determine genetic ancestry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By default, genetic studies of US population samples categorize individuals as European American, African American, Hispanic, or Asian (42,51,74,94,105). In Ibero-America, such categorization of research subjects is not standard, but studies of this type have been performed for some urban population samples (particularly in Brazil) (70,72,93,101) and for certain historic isolates (e.g., African-derived Brazilian Quilombos) (79). Studies in Ibero-America use the terms "white" and "black" as ancestry equivalents to the European American and African American categories used in the United States, we therefore focused on a comparison of these two categories across the continent.…”
Section: Genetic Ancestry In European Americans and African Americansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, stratification based on skin color does not reflect actual ancestral genetic contribution Pimenta et al, 2006;Suarez-Kurtz et al, 2007;Santos et al, 2009;Beuten et al, 2011;Lins et al, 2011;Pena et al, 2009Pena et al, , 2011. For instance, in Brazil, skin pigmentation correlates poorly with African ancestry .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%