2006
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2006.210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐Reported Sugar‐Sweetened Beverage Intake among College Students

Abstract: Self-reported sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among undergraduates is substantial and likely contributes considerable non-nutritive calories, which may contribute to weight gain. Black undergraduates may be particularly vulnerable due to higher sugared beverage intake. Obesity prevention interventions targeting reductions in sugar-sweetened beverages in this population merit consideration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
43
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
43
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On a positive note, the amount of soda consumed by our participants was much lower than previous self-reported daily soda intake among college males (non-athletes) at a university in the southern United States (2 vs. 48%) [38]. Even considering potential regional differences, the daily consumption of soda amongst our participants was quite low even though they had unlimited access to it in the dining hall.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…On a positive note, the amount of soda consumed by our participants was much lower than previous self-reported daily soda intake among college males (non-athletes) at a university in the southern United States (2 vs. 48%) [38]. Even considering potential regional differences, the daily consumption of soda amongst our participants was quite low even though they had unlimited access to it in the dining hall.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…In addition, although the relatively young sample of research participants is highly relevant for studying SSB consumption (West et al, 2006), populations of different ages may respond differently to IVEs and limits the generalizability of these results. Also, the current IVE simulation was focused on soft drinks among all SSBs because they are the most commonly consumed SSB (West et al, 2006). However, SSBs include seemingly benign beverages such as fruit juice and sports drinks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Other variables will include sweetened beverage intake[38, 50] and the social context module from the 2011 BRFSS, which was adapted for a self-administered format[38]. To assess the potential cost effectiveness of the intervention, the investigators will use the SF12 Health Instrument that can be converted into an SF6D score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%