“…5 past configurations of one type (in particular, separated flow past a divergent plate [7][8][9]) we can restrict ourselves to half the flow plane, whereas for the flows past other configurations, such as separated flows past a divergent cylinder or its combination with a plate [10][11][12], the entire flow should be considered starting from a certain value of the analog of the angle of attack. The fundamental difference between modeling steady separated flows of an ideal fluid [1][2][3][4][5][6] and unsteady separated flows of, again, an ideal fluid [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] consists in that in the latter case certain "singular" objects are used, such as vortex filaments, vortex cuts, vortex sheets infinitely rolled up at their ends, etc., which, strictly speaking, are far from having a physical meaning. Moreover, though making it possible to reveal many features of the flows under study (for example, the inviscid nature of the asymmetry of the flow around the analog of a circular cone at high angles of attack [10][11][12]) and to calculate, like the discrete vortex method [15], the parameters of two-dimensional and three-dimensional configurations important for practical applications, these approaches evoke a certain feeling of dissatisfaction.…”